2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting response to mowing in two abandoned rich fen plant communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, certain light‐demanding herbs in fens showed competitive release when woody cover was experimentally reduced (Curtis, ; Jacobson et al., ; Harding, ), and native and exotic shrubs invaded several Wisconsin fens coincident with a change in land‐use practices. In Europe, mowing, grazing, and burning helped keep some calcareous fens open, and cessation of these practices has led to the local loss of many characteristic species (Opdekamp et al., ; Menichino et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, certain light‐demanding herbs in fens showed competitive release when woody cover was experimentally reduced (Curtis, ; Jacobson et al., ; Harding, ), and native and exotic shrubs invaded several Wisconsin fens coincident with a change in land‐use practices. In Europe, mowing, grazing, and burning helped keep some calcareous fens open, and cessation of these practices has led to the local loss of many characteristic species (Opdekamp et al., ; Menichino et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of high competitor bulrush Bolboschoenus maritimus L. is likely to have similar impact of rushes on herbaceous characteristic communities of these habitats in the short term. Recent study revealed this problem [MENICHINO et al 2016]; as expected rapid regrowth of the dominant species limits the efficiency of cutting, leading to contrasting expected results. Therefore, relevant well-studied choice of the most advantageous mowing frequency will allow sustained control in rushes belt.…”
Section: Vegetation Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The cutting technique, followed by the export of the shallow litter, seems to have had less effect on the seed stock, but needs to be regularly maintained with optimum frequency to control the rapid regrowth of the rushes. The technique has also been adopted in many herbaceous restoration trials [BARBARO et al 2001;BIL-LETER et al 2007;DEER 2008;DUTOIT et al 2001;FYNN et al 2004;GRYSEELS 1989;LAVERGNE, MOLOFSKY 2006;MENICHINO et al 2016].…”
Section: Vegetation Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where semi-natural fen meadows, which will still bring associated increases in biodiversity and ecosystem services (Klimkowska et al, 2010), and may also reduce rates of C loss (Hendriks et al, 2007). In 4 much of Europe, including parts of UK and the Netherlands, the target ecosystem for fen restoration is a semi-natural environment involving ongoing water-level and vegetation management (Klötzli and Grootjans, 2001), for example to maintain or enhance plant species richness (Menichino et al, 2016). However, sometimes it may be that constraints in water availability result in unexpected vegetation shifts, often in undesired directions, which may limit the success of restoration attempts (Klötzli and Grootjans, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%