2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting responses of male and female foraging effort to year‐round wind conditions

Abstract: Summary There is growing interest in the effects of wind on wild animals, given evidence that wind speeds are increasing and becoming more variable in some regions, particularly at temperate latitudes. Wind may alter movement patterns or foraging ability, with consequences for energy budgets and, ultimately, demographic rates.These effects are expected to vary among individuals due to intrinsic factors such as sex, age or feeding proficiency. Furthermore, this variation is predicted to become more marked as wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate models are predicting that mean wind speeds will increase in many regions (McInnes et al, 2011;Young et al, 2011), which may have important consequences on foraging energetics. A recent study on European shags suggests that daily foraging time decreased with increasing wind speed (Lewis et al, 2015), which suggests that increased wave action reduces prey capture rates such that it becomes less economical to continue feeding, and hence birds return sooner to land (Daunt et al, 2006). Here, we show that flight performance is also affected by wind.…”
Section: Maximum Range Speed or Minimum Power Speedsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Climate models are predicting that mean wind speeds will increase in many regions (McInnes et al, 2011;Young et al, 2011), which may have important consequences on foraging energetics. A recent study on European shags suggests that daily foraging time decreased with increasing wind speed (Lewis et al, 2015), which suggests that increased wave action reduces prey capture rates such that it becomes less economical to continue feeding, and hence birds return sooner to land (Daunt et al, 2006). Here, we show that flight performance is also affected by wind.…”
Section: Maximum Range Speed or Minimum Power Speedsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The flight and diving performance of shags is affected by local weather, in particular wind conditions (Daunt et al 2006, Lewis et al 2015, Kogure et al 2016 and potentially rainfall, which in turn may affect diet composition as previously shown in other seabirds (Finney et al 1999, Stienen et al 2000. Therefore, we used hourly wind speed (m s ) and total daily rainfall (mm) on the day of sample collection.…”
Section: Daily Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is also evidence that seabird diet composition is altered by short-term weather conditions such as wind speed (Finney et al 1999, Stienen et al 2000, mediated by effects on flight performance and prey behaviour and catchability (Sagar & Sagar 1989, Weimerskirch et al 2000, Lewis et al 2015, Kogure et al 2016. At intermediate temporal scales, diet composition may display seasonal patterns if alternative prey show different scheduling of key life-history events and associated availability (Lewis et al 2001a, Davoren & Montevecchi 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Females also spent more time in flight over winter, despite covering similar total distances to males, and this seemed particularly marked in mid-winter (November to December), just after pair members started to follow less similar routes. While this apparent mismatch between flight time and distance may be due to inaccuracy in estimating distance from geolocation data, it could also result from sex differences in flight efficiency at certain wind speeds (Lewis et al 2015, Cornioley et al 2016 or exposure to different wind conditions when sexes visit different areas. One of our key results is that while pair total foraging effort was a good predictor of future breeding performance (higher foraging effort was associated with earlier breeding), this was mainly due to the effect in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%