2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting Sr and Nd isotopic behaviour during magma mingling; new insights from the Mannum A-type granite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nd and Sr isotope compositions were determined by thermal ionization mass spectrometry at the University of Adelaide (Australia) following the same protocol as Pankhurst et al (2011). The analytical data are given in Table DR4.…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nd and Sr isotope compositions were determined by thermal ionization mass spectrometry at the University of Adelaide (Australia) following the same protocol as Pankhurst et al (2011). The analytical data are given in Table DR4.…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes additional complexities to the interpretation of whole-rock isotope ratios. Pankhurst et al (2011c) The resulting magmas (containing isotopically distinct titanite crystals) were readily mixed due to similar viscosities. A similar process produced granites containing chemically similar yet isotopically dissimilar titanite crystals, which also mixed readily.…”
Section: Hf Isotope Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these systems reflect lithophile behaviour, but potentially may misrepresent a suspected mantle component, due to inheritance via magma assimilation or mingling (e.g. Pankhurst et al, 2011c). The Lu-Hf system broadly approximates the Sm-Nd, however due to the relative difference in D values, the Lu-Hf system is less affected by AFC processes (following the models of DePaolo, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many compositional variations have been found for A‐type granites, and there is no consensus on their origin (Bonin, ). A‐type granites are genetically diverse and can be produced from various sources and by different processes; thus, several origin models have been proposed, including (a) fractional crystallization of mantle‐derived melts (Anderson, Frost, & Frost, ; Jiang, Zhang, Zhou, & Liu, ; Mansouri Esfahani, Khalili, Kochhar, & Gupta, ; Namur et al, ), (b) partial melting of crustal rocks (Clemens, Holloway, & White, ; Dall'Agnol, Scaillet, & Pichavant, ; Whalen et al, ), and (c) hybridization between anatectic crustal and mantle‐derived magmas (Jung, Mezger, & Hoernes, ; Karsli et al, ; Pankhurst, Vernon, Turner, Schaefer, & Foden, ; Trumbull, Harris, Frindt, & Wigand, ; Yang, Wu, Chung, Wilde, & Chu, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%