2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting the effects of microplastic types, concentrations and nutrient enrichment on freshwater communities and ecosystem functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations we used in our study are comparable to those reported in the field, with the mean concentration of microplastics found in inland freshwaters determined to be approximately 1 to 1.9 microplastics/L with a range of <0 to 50 microplastics/L (D' Avignon et al, 2022;Klasios & Tseng, 2023). Our exposures of 10 (low treatment) and 50 (high treatment) microplastics/L are slightly higher than the average concentration reported in lake water in nature but significantly lower than the majority of published laboratory studies (Bucci et al, 2020) and lower than those used in other mesocosm studies (Aljaibachi et al, 2020;Marchant et al, 2023;Yıldız et al, 2022). We chose to investigate the effects of polyester microplastic fibers because they are one of the most dominant morphologies and polymer types found in the environment (Klasios & Tseng, 2023;Napper et al, 2023) and within organisms (Rebelein et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The concentrations we used in our study are comparable to those reported in the field, with the mean concentration of microplastics found in inland freshwaters determined to be approximately 1 to 1.9 microplastics/L with a range of <0 to 50 microplastics/L (D' Avignon et al, 2022;Klasios & Tseng, 2023). Our exposures of 10 (low treatment) and 50 (high treatment) microplastics/L are slightly higher than the average concentration reported in lake water in nature but significantly lower than the majority of published laboratory studies (Bucci et al, 2020) and lower than those used in other mesocosm studies (Aljaibachi et al, 2020;Marchant et al, 2023;Yıldız et al, 2022). We chose to investigate the effects of polyester microplastic fibers because they are one of the most dominant morphologies and polymer types found in the environment (Klasios & Tseng, 2023;Napper et al, 2023) and within organisms (Rebelein et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Similar to our findings, Aljaibachi et al (2020) found no differences in the abundance of Daphnia and other macroinvertebrates between control and polystyrene microplastic sphere-exposed mesocosms. In addition, Marchant et al (2023) reported that taxonomic richness and plankton community composition were not affected by polyethylene and polylactic acid fragment exposure. Furthermore, Yıldız et al (2022) reported that a mixture of microplastics (various polymers in sphere and fragment morphologies) did not alter the structure and population dynamics of their experimentally assembled freshwater invertebrate community, although they did find evidence of microplastics entering multiple trophic levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we show the unique impacts of three commonly encountered plastics on freshwater benthic ecosystem function, including primary production and nutrient cycling. While others have investigated the impacts of microplastics on freshwater ecosystem function [97][98][99][100][101], this is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine this specific set of diverse plastics under such a comprehensive combination of metrics in freshwater sediments, and the results point to a clear need for additional work to better understand the potential risk that microplastic poses to benthic ecosystems. The ubiquity of both use (i.e., PET clothing, tire debris from vehicles, and PVC in construction/tools) and the environmental presence of the polymers selected for this study suggest a broad applicability of the work and also highlight the extraordinary complexity of the "plastic problem".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is not surprising, because microplastics cause no effects on the survival and growth of many invertebrates, but they still may affect the functioning of only sensitive aquatic species [58]. Moreover, recent studies [59] showed that the negative impacts of microplastics may not be readily visible at the ecosystem scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%