2006
DOI: 10.1039/b5rp90022k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting the expectations for student understanding of chemistry with levels achieved: a brief case-study of student nurses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some aspects of these two compulsory courses in physiology were perceived as difficult by some students, a finding consistent with other similar courses (17,19). Others (5,6) have stated that knowledge of physiology was perceived by health professionals as important, essential for questioning medical decisions, and ensuring patient safety, but was limited in its undergraduate delivery.…”
Section: How We Teach: Generalizable Education Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Some aspects of these two compulsory courses in physiology were perceived as difficult by some students, a finding consistent with other similar courses (17,19). Others (5,6) have stated that knowledge of physiology was perceived by health professionals as important, essential for questioning medical decisions, and ensuring patient safety, but was limited in its undergraduate delivery.…”
Section: How We Teach: Generalizable Education Researchsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The idea that guided us when choosing the elements of knowledge to be represented in the matrix was that students who knew these elements of knowledge should have the basic knowledge expected from high school chemistry majors. The matrix is based upon elements of knowledge drawn from the ATLAS (AAAS, 2007), high school text books (e.g., Ebbing and Gammon, 2002;Zumdahl, 1989), research literature on high school chemistry (Ben-Zvi et al, 1986;Coll and Taylor, 2002;Coll and Treagust, 2001;Harrison and Treagust, 2000;Herron, 1996;Levy Nahum et al, 2006;Othman et al, 2008;Peterson et al, 1986;Scalise et al, 2006b;Taagepera and Noori, 2000;Taber, 2001;Taber and Coll, 2002;Teichert and Stacy, 2002), and verbal and written utterances made by students and teachers as they learned and taught about chemical bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these types of assessments can provide support for educators interested in moving away from a deficit model to one of dynamic development and the reweaving of ideas . While a few extant assessments in CER are explicitly linked to developmental perspectives on learning, ,, continued efforts are needed for responding to the call for the creation of such assessments . From their inception, OMC items were created as assessment tools capable of linking student cognitive development to measured variables using Rasch modeling .…”
Section: Question 3: For What Purposes Are Omc Assessments Useful In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%