2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-020-00044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting the expression pattern change of polyamine oxidase genes and photosynthetic efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under drought stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in plant biomass due to drought stress was higher in the sensitive cultivar (GY605) than in the tolerant cultivars (ZD622, ZS11), which is in line with previous studies on B. napus , B. rapa , B. campestris , and Triticum aestivum (Cha et al, 2020; Grieco et al, 2020; Khanzada et al, 2020; Shawon et al, 2020). Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B. Li, Feng, et al, 2020; Pakdel et al, 2020; Zaid et al, 2020). A wealth of literature provided ample evidence that drought stress adversely affected plant biomass (shoot and root fresh and dry biomass) in addition to water content in Brassicaceae species (Bhuiyan et al, 2019), B. napus (Dai et al, 2020), B. carinata (Samanta et al, 2020), and B. oleracea (He et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease in plant biomass due to drought stress was higher in the sensitive cultivar (GY605) than in the tolerant cultivars (ZD622, ZS11), which is in line with previous studies on B. napus , B. rapa , B. campestris , and Triticum aestivum (Cha et al, 2020; Grieco et al, 2020; Khanzada et al, 2020; Shawon et al, 2020). Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B. Li, Feng, et al, 2020; Pakdel et al, 2020; Zaid et al, 2020). A wealth of literature provided ample evidence that drought stress adversely affected plant biomass (shoot and root fresh and dry biomass) in addition to water content in Brassicaceae species (Bhuiyan et al, 2019), B. napus (Dai et al, 2020), B. carinata (Samanta et al, 2020), and B. oleracea (He et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B. Li, Feng, et al, 2020;Pakdel et al, 2020;Zaid et al, 2020). A wealth of literature provided ample evidence that drought stress adversely affected plant biomass (shoot and root fresh and dry biomass) in addition to water content in Brassicaceae species (Bhuiyan et al, 2019), B. napus (Dai et al, 2020), B. carinata (Samanta et al, 2020), and B. oleracea (He et al, 2020).…”
Section: Tolerant Cultivars Showed Enhanced Activities Of Antioxidative Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The reduction was more obvious in drought sensitive GS genotype relative to drought tolerant PS genotype as observed in previous studies on B. napus , Brassica rapa , and B. campestris ( Cha et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Grieco et al, 2020 ; Khanzada et al, 2020 ; Shawon et al, 2020 ). Drought stress mediated plant growth reduction is mainly associated with the loss of cell turgor pressure, affected the cell wall biosynthesis and reduced the cell division or cell expansion ( Pakdel et al, 2020 ). These results are quite similar to several studies suggesting that drought stress severely affects the plant growth and RWC in B. napus , B. carinata , and Brassica oleracea , respectively ( Dai et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2020 ; Samanta et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exogenous PAs provided protection under osmotic and cadmium stress [8,9], but the mode of action and the degree of protection depended on the alteration in the PA metabolism; thus, it has been demonstrated that "the more PA, the better" statement cannot be generalized [10,11,13]. Most of these experiments were carried out in growth chambers with photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in the range of 100-270 µmol m 2 s −1 with one day/night regime [8][9][10][11]13,14,22,29,32,34,36]; some of them were conducted under higher light conditions [30,31,41] and none of them under different hours of illumination. In addition, only a few studies are available on the comparison of changes in dedicated components of the PA metabolism under different light conditions [21][22][23][24][25][26], and none of them reported the simultaneous effect of exogenous PA treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous valuable studies have been published on the investigation of PA content and metabolism either under normal growth conditions or during biotic or abiotic stresses in various plant species [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. On the other hand, several studies have been published on monitoring the protective effect of exogenous PAs [8][9][10][11]13,14,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%