2018
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.201700019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting three alternative versions of Timoshenko‐Ehrenfest theory for beam on Winkler elastic foundation – simply supported beam

Abstract: In this paper the free vibration frequencies of beam on one‐parameter (Winkler) elastic foundation are analyzed via original Timoshenko‐Ehrenfest theory as well as two truncated versions of the Timoshenko‐Ehrenfest beam theory. The traditional version of Timoshenko‐Ehrenfest beam theory is contrasted with the truncated version that lacks the fourth‐order time derivative, as well as with the recently developed version that incorporates slope inertia effect. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach are indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important initial motivation for dynamic analysis originates from the needs of railway engineering in the evaluation of the effect of moving loads [7]. In this case, apart from the aforementioned Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, refined Timoshenko-type formulations have also been adapted, see, e.g., [8][9][10][11]; and also more recent publications concerned with harmonic vibrations of a Timoshenko-type beam supported by a Winkler foundation, see [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important initial motivation for dynamic analysis originates from the needs of railway engineering in the evaluation of the effect of moving loads [7]. In this case, apart from the aforementioned Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, refined Timoshenko-type formulations have also been adapted, see, e.g., [8][9][10][11]; and also more recent publications concerned with harmonic vibrations of a Timoshenko-type beam supported by a Winkler foundation, see [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It still finds numerous applications including modelling of transit and edge bending waves, (Brun et al, 2013), (Kaplunov et al, 2016b), (Kaplunov et al, 2014), see also (Kaplunov and Nobili, 2017a) using refined Pasternak model. Among the publications on the subject we also mention (Elishakoff et al, 2018;Li et al, 2009;Ponnusamy and Selvamani, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the springs operated independently of each other, they only provided local resistance at the point of loading and failed to generate resistance elsewhere [25]. Numerous achievements were proposed based on this model [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], deducing and calculating the stress and deformation of the structural system of immersed tube tunnels under the action of uneven soil layers and analyzing the sensitivity of various influencing factors to the settlement, in addition to obtaining a set of reasonable calculation methods for settlement control standards of segmental immersed tube tunnels. The research results provide a favorable scientific basis for the optimization of the tunnel foundation scheme and the improvement of the construction technology to ensure the safety of the structure to a greater extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%