2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icme51207.2021.9428089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrastive Feature Decomposition for Image Reflection Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… In P17 [84], the proposed network first separates the extracted features into two branches using feature learning: background constituent and reflection constituent. The contrastive feature decomposition sub-network achieves more accurate feature decomposition by their proposed contrastive supervision algorithm.…”
Section: Rq4 What Are the Architectures Of The Proposed Reflection Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… In P17 [84], the proposed network first separates the extracted features into two branches using feature learning: background constituent and reflection constituent. The contrastive feature decomposition sub-network achieves more accurate feature decomposition by their proposed contrastive supervision algorithm.…”
Section: Rq4 What Are the Architectures Of The Proposed Reflection Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrastive feature decomposition sub-network achieves more accurate feature decomposition by their proposed contrastive supervision algorithm. In the end, the dense feature refinement sub-network tries to refine the details of restored images in order to accomplish images with high standard including both the background and the reflection images [84].…”
Section: Rq4 What Are the Architectures Of The Proposed Reflection Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform human evaluation to compare our model with other topthree most powerful methods for reflection removal including ERRNet [2], IBCLN [1] and DMGN [8]. We randomly select We conduct experiments to compare our GLSGN with nine state-of-theart methods [1], [2], [7]- [9], [30], [41], [48], [49] for image reflection removal on five datasets including our proposed ultra high-resolution datasets as UHR4K-Real and UHR4K-Syn, and multiple public benchmark datasets with regular resolution as Real20 [40], Nature [1], and SIR 2 [37]. Table VII lists the quantitative results of various methods for image reflection removal on five datasets in terms of PSNR and SSIM.…”
Section: B Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%