Contributing to Global Health: Development of a Consensus-Based Whole Systems Research Strategy for Anthroposophic Medicine

Abstract

Background Whole medicine and health systems like traditional and complementary medicine systems (T&CM) are part of healthcare around the world. One key feature of T&CM is its focus on patient-centered and multimodal care and the integration of intercultural perspectives in a wide range of settings. It may contribute to good health and well being for people as part of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. The authentic, rigorous, and fair evaluation of such a medical system, with its inherent complexity and individualization, imposes methodological challenges. Hence, we propose a broad research strategy to test and characterize its possible contribution to health. Methods To develop a research strategy for a specific T&CM system, Anthroposophic Medicine (AM), applying multimodal integrative healthcare based on a four-level concept of man, we used a three-phase consensus process with experts and key stakeholders, consisting of (1) premeeting methodological literature and AM research review and interviews to supplement or revise items of the research strategy and tailor them to AM research, (2) face-to-face consensus meetings further developing and tailoring the strategy, and (3) postmeeting feedback and review, followed by finalization. Results Currently, AM covers many fields of medical specialties in varied levels of healthcare settings, such as outpatient and inpatient; primary, secondary, and tertiary care; and health education and pedagogy. It is by definition integrated with conventional medicine in the public healthcare system. It applies specific medicines, nursing techniques, arts therapies, eurythmy therapy, rhythmical massage, counseling, and psychotherapy, and it is provided by medical doctors, nurses, therapists, midwives, and nutritionists. A research strategy authentic to this level of complexity should comprise items with a focus on (I) efficacy and effectiveness, divided into (a) evaluation of the multimodal and multidisciplinary medical system as a whole, or of complex multimodal therapy concept, (b) a reasonable amount of methodologically rigorous, confirmatory randomized controlled trials on exemplary pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies and indications, (c) a wide range of interventions and patient-centered care strategies with less extensive formats like well-conducted small trails, observational studies, and high-quality case reports and series, or subgroup analyses from whole-system studies, or health service research; (II) safety; (III) economics; (IV) evidence synthesis; (V) methodologic issues; (VI) biomedical, physiological, pharmacological, pharmaceutical, psychological, anthropological, and nosological issues as well as innovation and development; (VI) patient perspective and involvement, public needs, and ethics; (VII) educational matters and professionalism; and (IX) disease prevention, health promotion, and public health. Conclusion The research strategy extends to and complements the prevailing hierarchical system by introducing a broad “evidence hous...

Design Strategies for Healing Internal Environments and Workplaces. A Theoretical Framework

“…f moderation also focused on the work of Mahmood and Tayib (2020), which found that key elements to building a healing environment: (1) Appearance, (2) Privacy, and (3) control. This is consistent with methods such as Kienle et al (2019), excluding cal medicine is also derived from both consensus-based and traditional and y medicine (T&CM) programs:…”

“…The perspective described above is compatible with an approach known as anthroposophical medicine, which also approaches human health from a systemic or holistic perspective. More specifically, the anthroposophical concept, conceives of the human organism as a manifestation of multiple elements including physical forces, formative growth forces, and an interacting anima, or soul, as outlined by (Sparby, 2020) (Kienle et al 2019). From this perspective, human existence can be thought of as a kind of system of systems, complete with sensory, motor, nervous, and circulatory systems, and, finally, with an additional Geist, or spirit, involved in individual expression and reflection.…”

Anthroposophic Medicine: A Short Monograph and Narrative Review—Foundations, Essential Characteristics, Scientific Basis, Safety, Effectiveness and Misconceptions

“…51,57,126 A whole systemsbased research strategy for anthroposophic medicine has recently been proposed and published. 305 6. Critics charge anthroposophic physicians with medical neglect, improper diagnosis, and inappropriate and failed treatment.…”

Gynecologists’ attitudes toward and use of complementary and integrative medicine approaches: results of a national survey in Germany

“…While not a recognized qualification for physicians, anthroposophic medicine is commonly used by German physicians. This medical system is based on a specific organismic concept and uses drugs derived from herbal, mineral, and animal sources, eurythmy (a specific movement therapy), art therapy, rhythmical massage, and lifestyle recommendations [ 18 ] (Supplementary digital file 2). No formal qualification is mandatory to practice IM in Germany.…”