2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of biofilm to water quality, survival and growth of juveniles of the freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus (Decapoda, Parastacidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus juveniles (Viau et al . ), Farfantepenaeus paulensis juveniles (Wasielesky et al . ), Penaeus monodon postlarvae (Hari et al .…”
Section: Bacteria As Food In Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus juveniles (Viau et al . ), Farfantepenaeus paulensis juveniles (Wasielesky et al . ), Penaeus monodon postlarvae (Hari et al .…”
Section: Bacteria As Food In Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este trabajo, no hubo colonización de biofilm ya que los experimentos fueron realizados en condiciones controladas de laboratorio, con recambio de agua y sin exposición a la luz solar. Sin embargo, el exceso de red podría ser una desventaja para el cultivo a cielo abierto, ya que impediría el paso de luz (Parnes & Sagi, 2002), evitando que las comunidades de micro-organismos (biofilm) colonicen la red, mejoren la calidad de agua, y constituyan una fuente adicional de alimento para los juveniles (Viau et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Estas redes se unen entre sí semejando plantas acuáticas y ocupando la columna de agua. En esta superficie se desarrolla y crece el biofilm que los juveniles utilizan como alimento y mejora la calidad de agua (FAO, 2010;Viau et al, 2012). Las redes también proporcionan una mayor superficie, optimizando el espacio y protegiendo a los juveniles de otros de mayor tamaño (Villarreal & Peláez, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In marine shrimps production, the biofilm‐based culture systems with low or no water exchange showed improve water quality by recycling and recovering nutrients, and thus improving yield and reducing the use of water, and waste water discharge to the environment (Ballester, Wasielesky, Cavalli & Abreu ; Holl, Otoshi & Unabia ; Audelo‐Naranjo, Martínez‐Córdova, Gómez Jiménez & Voltolina ; Viau, Moreira Souza, Wasielesky, Abreu & Ballester ; among others). For freshwater crustacean culture, the effect of biofilm as an alternative and/or a complement food source in the culture has only been studied in the giant prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Asaduzzaman, Wahab, Verdegem, Huque, Salam & Azim ; Uddin, Azim, Wahaba & Verdegem ; Hasan, Rahman, Hosen & Bashar ) and in the crayfish species Cherax destructor (Jones & Thanuthong ) and Cherax quadricarinatus (Viau, Ostera, Tolivia, Ballester, Abreu & Rodríguez ). However, no studies have been previously reported on the potential benefits of biofilm on the culture of freshwater shrimps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%