2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja026872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Bursty Bulk Flows to the Global Dipolarization of the Magnetotail During an Isolated Substorm

Abstract: This paper addresses the question of the contribution of azimuthally localized flow channels and magnetic field dipolarizations embedded in them in the global dipolarization of the inner magnetosphere during substorms. We employ the high-resolution Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry global magnetosphere magnetohydrodynamic model and simulate an isolated substorm event, which was observed by the geostationary satellites and by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft. The results of our simulations reveal that plasma sheet fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(128 reference statements)
9
74
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different possible oblique motions of the BICI generated dipolarization fronts are expected to modify the suggested particle injection and acceleration mechanisms at dipolarization fronts that were predicted using, for example, test particle simulations in magnetohydrodynamic models (Birn et al, 2013; Sorathia et al, 2018; Ukhorskiy et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2011). Note that as the global magnetohydrodynamic simulations showed, dipolarization fronts that were produced by reconnection at more tailward locations may shortly deviate from their otherwise radial propagation on their way to the dipolar field lines (Merkin et al, 2019; Ukhorskiy et al, 2018; Wiltberger et al, 2015). We also admit that the dipolarization fronts released by BICI may later be forced to move more radially by the ambient plasma.…”
Section: Important Details Of Bici Head Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different possible oblique motions of the BICI generated dipolarization fronts are expected to modify the suggested particle injection and acceleration mechanisms at dipolarization fronts that were predicted using, for example, test particle simulations in magnetohydrodynamic models (Birn et al, 2013; Sorathia et al, 2018; Ukhorskiy et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2011). Note that as the global magnetohydrodynamic simulations showed, dipolarization fronts that were produced by reconnection at more tailward locations may shortly deviate from their otherwise radial propagation on their way to the dipolar field lines (Merkin et al, 2019; Ukhorskiy et al, 2018; Wiltberger et al, 2015). We also admit that the dipolarization fronts released by BICI may later be forced to move more radially by the ambient plasma.…”
Section: Important Details Of Bici Head Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that BBFs with low-entropy plasmas (plasma bubbles) often penetrated the inner magnetosphere (Dubyagin et al, 2011). In numerical simulations, those bubbles localized in local time produced global dipolarization in the inner magnetosphere (Merkin et al, 2019) and generated an ionospheric current system such as the westward electro-O. Saka: The increase in the curvature radius of geomagnetic field lines jet, Harang discontinuity and poleward expansion of aurora in the substorm expansion phase (Yang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to determine the onset timing of substorm processes such as magnetotail flow burst, field line dipolarization and particle injections. To resolve the timing uncertainties, auroras in global satellite images (Nakamura et al, 2001;Miyashita et al, 2009), intensifications of auroral kilometric radiation (Fairfield et al, 1999;Morioka et al, 2010) and dispersionless particle injection in geosynchronous orbit (Birn et al, 1997) were used. Geomagnetic Pi2 micropulsations observed on the ground are another useful tool for determination of the substorm timing (Sakurai and Saito, 1976;Nagai et al, 1998;Baumjohann et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ìîäåëþâàííÿ îñîáëèâîñòåé òàêèõ ñòðóêòóð ï³ä ÷àñ ³çîëüîâàíî¿ ñóááóð³ ï³äòâåðäèëî ¿õí³ ñïîñòåðåaeí³ âëàñòèâîñò³. Áóëî âñòàíîâëåíî, ùî ïåðåíåñåííÿ ìàãí³òíîãî ïîòîêó ïåðåäóñ³ì â³äáóâàºòüñÿ ÷åðåç àçèìóòàëüíî ëîêàë³çîâàí³ ³ìïóëüñí³ ïîòîêè [6].  äàí³é ðîáîò³ ìè âèçíà -÷àºìî îñîáëèâîñò³ ïîøèðåííÿ òà îð³ºíòàö³¿ ³ìïóëüñíèõ ïîòîê³â/òðàí -糺íò³â çà äîïîìîãîþ áàãàòîñóïóòíèêîâèõ âèì³ðþâàíü, ùî äîçâîëèëî íàì â³äòâîðèòè ¿õí³ ñïîñòåðåaeí³ åâîëþö³éí³ îñîáëèâîñò³ â îáëàñò³ äèïîëÿðèçàö³¿ ìàãí³òíîãî ïîëÿ.…”
Section: âñòóïunclassified