2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of country-specific electricity mix and charging time to environmental impact of battery electric vehicles: A case study of electric buses in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, Italy differs from Germany, and Nordic countries in general, in the availability of wind and solar energy, with this latter taking the lion's share among intermittent RES, as well as in the reliance on natural gas, rather than coal, for conventional electricity generation. Such differences become particularly important when electricity generation from RES is not available or not enough, depending on the installed capacity or the time of the year, and the additional electricity demand has to be provided by conventional power plants, thus limiting or nullifying the environmental benefit of EV especially when such plants are powered by carbon-intensive fuels [12] and making CO2 savings potential greater where renewable contribution to the electricity mix is higher [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Italy differs from Germany, and Nordic countries in general, in the availability of wind and solar energy, with this latter taking the lion's share among intermittent RES, as well as in the reliance on natural gas, rather than coal, for conventional electricity generation. Such differences become particularly important when electricity generation from RES is not available or not enough, depending on the installed capacity or the time of the year, and the additional electricity demand has to be provided by conventional power plants, thus limiting or nullifying the environmental benefit of EV especially when such plants are powered by carbon-intensive fuels [12] and making CO2 savings potential greater where renewable contribution to the electricity mix is higher [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of carbon reduction for electric buses to replace fossil fuel-powered buses has been studied by many scholars. The most recent literature includes [13,[17][18][19]. Bakker and Konings [17] have referred to battery-electric buses as zero-emission buses, as they result in far less local air pollution than their diesel counterparts [20,21].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [13] have found that the fuel cell electric transit buses, in comparison with diesel buses, consume less energy overall and have lower air emissions on a well-to-wheel basis in the United States. Rupp et al [19] have studied the impact of diesel and electric vehicles on CO 2 equivalent emissions in Germany from a life-cycle perspective, and they have found that electric vehicles are particularly advantageous in urban traffic because of their positive environmental balance, which is based on greater energy conversion efficiency and the possibility of recuperating the braking energy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many countries are actively exploring a combination of clean energy and road transportation electrification. Compared with traditional fuel vehicles, electric vehicles (EVs) take advantage of lower energy consumption costs and more environmentally friendly features [2]. Promoting the use of EVs is an effective way to deal with road traffic pollution and global climate change [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%