2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.234149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Dividend Policy Stability to the Measurement of Dividend Announcement and Ex-Dividend Effects on the French Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results are not consistent with some previous studies. Indeed, Romon (2000) doubted about the dividend clientele hypothesis when examining the stock price reactions at the ex-dividend date. This author claimed that the dividend clientele effect seems to be extremely limited because the market knows the firm dividend policy level before the ex-dividend dates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our results are not consistent with some previous studies. Indeed, Romon (2000) doubted about the dividend clientele hypothesis when examining the stock price reactions at the ex-dividend date. This author claimed that the dividend clientele effect seems to be extremely limited because the market knows the firm dividend policy level before the ex-dividend dates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Romon (2000) doubted the dividend clientele hypothesis. By examining the stock price reactions at the dividend announcement and that at the ex-dividend date, he found that around the dividend announcement date, the informational effect of dividend announcement depends on the firm dividend policy level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all international studies detect an ex-day price drop of less than one but, as in the US, evidence is mixed as to the existence of a tax clientele effect. Bell and Jenkinson (2000) and Michaely and Murgia (1995) find evidence supportive of that hypothesis in the UK and Italy; Romon (2000), Milonas and Travlos (2001) reject the existence of tax effects in France and Greece. For Canada, Bauer et al (2006) rule out both tax and tick-size effects on ex-day behavior, thereby agreeing with the previous findings of Lakonishok and Vermaelen (1983) and Booth and Johnston (1984), who find that the ex-day price drop was smaller than would be consistent with the tax regimes in effect.…”
Section: Evidence From Non-us Stock Marketsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, it is highly probable that the ex-dividend date will not contaminate our finding as our event window extends only up to ten days postdividend declaration [2]. Moreover, unlike dividend announcements, exdividend is an expected event, and the previous study has documented its insignificant impact on stock price movement (Romon, 2000). Apart from the event window, an event study needs to specify an estimation window that indicates the period used to estimate the expected returns.…”
Section: Event Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%