2014
DOI: 10.5958/2249-6270.2014.01107.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Farm Women in Household Income: Evidence from Western Uttar Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean time spent on harvesting of fodder in the present study (5.64 ± 0.19 man-hours per ton or 96.81 ± 9.39 manhours per acre) was in agreement to that of Sreedhar and Ranganadham (2009), Sahay et al (2015) and Nandaniya et al (2022). However, the results of the present study were higher than those of CIAE ( 2004), Singh and Aalam (2017) and Nikam et al (2017), and lower than those of Baliyan and Kumar (2014), which might be due to variations in efficiency of labourers, amount of weed, etc. About 1.86 ± 0.11 man-hours per ton or 32.45 ± 4.01 man-hours per acre was needed for loading of fodder bundles.…”
Section: Harvesting Loading Transport Chaffing and Feedingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean time spent on harvesting of fodder in the present study (5.64 ± 0.19 man-hours per ton or 96.81 ± 9.39 manhours per acre) was in agreement to that of Sreedhar and Ranganadham (2009), Sahay et al (2015) and Nandaniya et al (2022). However, the results of the present study were higher than those of CIAE ( 2004), Singh and Aalam (2017) and Nikam et al (2017), and lower than those of Baliyan and Kumar (2014), which might be due to variations in efficiency of labourers, amount of weed, etc. About 1.86 ± 0.11 man-hours per ton or 32.45 ± 4.01 man-hours per acre was needed for loading of fodder bundles.…”
Section: Harvesting Loading Transport Chaffing and Feedingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, Sreedhar and Ranganadham (2009) reported higher value which was probably due to variations in capacity of motor, condition of soil, efficiency of labourers etc. The mean time taken for fertilizer application (0.56 ± 0.03 man-hours per acre) was lower than that reported by Sreedhar and Ranganadham (2009) and Baliyan and Kumar (2014). The reason for this disagreement might be variations in the procedure of application, the quantity applied and efficiency of labourers.…”
Section: Furrow Irrigation and Fertilizer Applicationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation