2024
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of individual and cumulative social determinants of health underlying gender disparities in periodontitis in a representative US population: A cross‐sectional NHANES study

Jing‐Hong Liang,
Mei‐Ling Liu,
Ying‐Qi Pu
et al.

Abstract: AimTo examine the impact of both individual and cumulative social determinants of health (SDoH) on the likelihood of developing periodontitis, while also exploring any gender disparities in this relationship.Materials and MethodsData of self‐reported SDoH domains and sub‐items based on Healthy People 2030 were obtained from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys between 1999 and 2014. Logistic regression models, weighted by survey responses, were used to examine the relationship between SDo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the complex sampling designs and sampling weights in our analyses, we incorporated appropriate sample weights that accounted for differential non-response and/or non-coverage rates, as well as adjustments for oversampling of specific groups, according to the NHANES Analysis and Reporting Guidelines (28)(29)(30). Categorical variables were described with sample counts (n) and percentage (%), while continuous variables were described with mean ± standard error (SE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complex sampling designs and sampling weights in our analyses, we incorporated appropriate sample weights that accounted for differential non-response and/or non-coverage rates, as well as adjustments for oversampling of specific groups, according to the NHANES Analysis and Reporting Guidelines (28)(29)(30). Categorical variables were described with sample counts (n) and percentage (%), while continuous variables were described with mean ± standard error (SE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%