2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006jd007167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of ion‐induced nucleation to new particle formation: Methodology and its application to atmospheric observations in Boulder, Colorado

Abstract: [1] This paper investigates the role of ion-induced nucleation (IIN) in new particle formation events observed near ground level at a sampling site located near Boulder, Colorado (14 March 2004 to 27 October 2005. Measurements of mobility distributions of small and intermediate ions (0.4-6.3 nm), size distributions of total particles (3 nm to 5 mm), and charged fractions (2.5-25 nm) were carried out. The relative contributions of neutral nucleation and IIN were inferred using both qualitative and quantitative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
108
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher ion-induced nucleation fraction at 2 nm than at 1.6 nm suggests that ions at 2 nm may be formed by coagulation between small ions and neutral clusters. In previous studies the ion-induced nucleation fraction has been observed to be typically low, less than 10 %, in the continental boundary layer (Iida et al, 2006;Manninen et al, 2010). Figure 6 shows the median diurnal variation of the concentrations of neutral clusters, charged clusters and recombination products on NPF event days and on the only non-event day.…”
Section: J Kontkanen Et Al: High Concentrations Of Sub-3nm Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher ion-induced nucleation fraction at 2 nm than at 1.6 nm suggests that ions at 2 nm may be formed by coagulation between small ions and neutral clusters. In previous studies the ion-induced nucleation fraction has been observed to be typically low, less than 10 %, in the continental boundary layer (Iida et al, 2006;Manninen et al, 2010). Figure 6 shows the median diurnal variation of the concentrations of neutral clusters, charged clusters and recombination products on NPF event days and on the only non-event day.…”
Section: J Kontkanen Et Al: High Concentrations Of Sub-3nm Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some model studies underline the importance of ions Turco, 2000, 2008), while field measurements conducted with ion spectrometers suggest only a minor contribution of ions to NPF in the continental boundary layer (Iida et al, 2006;Kulmala et al, 2007;Manninen et al, 2010) and also higher in the troposphere . Recent instrumental development has enabled measuring the concentrations of sub-3nm particles also with condensation particle counters, including a Particle Size Magnifier (PSM; Vanhanen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the particle population is not in charge equilibrium but either overcharged or undercharged, the NAIS will overestimate or underestimate the total particle concentrations, respectively . During NPF the charging state of aerosol particles was observed to be frequently overcharged Iida et al, 2006;Laakso et al, 2007). Additionally, an overestimation of the total particle concentration by a factor of 2-3 is a general characteristic of NAIS Figure 1.…”
Section: Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, comprehensive field measurements of NPF events at different locations in Europe showed an earlier formation of charged particles compared to total particles (neutral + charged particles; Manninen et al, 2010). Furthermore, the charging state of aerosol particles during NPF was observed to be frequently overcharged Iida et al, 2006;Laakso et al, 2007). The ratio of charged particle concentrations to neutral particle concentrations in a defined diameter interval is defined as the charged fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) (Heisler and Friedlander, 1977;Weber et al, 1996;Iida et al, 2006;Kuang et al, 2008Kuang et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Previous Approaches To Estimate Formation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%