2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of macroalgal wrack consumers to dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations in intertidal pore waters of sandy beaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DistLM modeling revealed that the abundance of giant kelp wrack accounted for a significant, and the largest amount, of variation in Megalorchestia - Thinopinus abundance and biomass across all beaches. This finding is consistent with reports from mainland beaches, where the abundances of Megalorchestia can exceed fifty thousand individuals per meter of shoreline and correlate strongly with the amount of wrack on the beach [ 8 , 23 , 75 ]. The area of kelp canopy offshore of our study beaches in late summer-early fall 2018 (July, August, September), and the presumptive source of wrack to the beach inshore, did not account for a significant amount of variation in kelp wrack on the beach or the abundance or biomass of beach invertebrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DistLM modeling revealed that the abundance of giant kelp wrack accounted for a significant, and the largest amount, of variation in Megalorchestia - Thinopinus abundance and biomass across all beaches. This finding is consistent with reports from mainland beaches, where the abundances of Megalorchestia can exceed fifty thousand individuals per meter of shoreline and correlate strongly with the amount of wrack on the beach [ 8 , 23 , 75 ]. The area of kelp canopy offshore of our study beaches in late summer-early fall 2018 (July, August, September), and the presumptive source of wrack to the beach inshore, did not account for a significant amount of variation in kelp wrack on the beach or the abundance or biomass of beach invertebrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sandy upper intertidal zone is associated with the distributions of key beach organisms, biodiversity and ecosystem functions, including the accumulation of macrophyte wrack and the wrack-associated invertebrate community 67,69 . This often narrow zone supports ~ 45% of total intertidal invertebrate biodiversity, provides prey resources for birds and fish, and plays a vital role in detrital processing and nutrient cycling 51,[68][69][70][71][72][73] . These key upper beach zones are already scarce and/or ephemeral for many beaches in the study region with consequent loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand of the upper intertidal zone is associated with the distributions of key beach organisms, biodiversity and ecosystem functions, including the accumulation of macrophyte wrack and the wrack-associated invertebrate community. This often narrow zone supports ~45% of total intertidal invertebrate biodiversity, provides prey resources for birds and fish, and plays a vital role in detrital processing and nutrient cycling 2011;Goodridge and Melack, 2014;Lowman et al, 2019;Jaramillo et al, 2020). These key upper beach zones are already scarce and/or ephemeral for many beaches in the study region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%