Contribution of mineral N to young grapevine in the presence or absence of cover crops

Brunetto, Gustavo; Lorensini, Felipe; Ceretta, Carlos Alberto; Ferreira, Paulo Ademar Avelar; Couto, Rafael da Rosa; Conti, Lessandro De; Ciotta, Marlise Nara; Kulmann, Matheus Severo de Souza; Schneider, Rodrigo Otávio; Somavilla, Luiza Michelon; Tiecher, Tadeu Luís; Giacomini, Sandro José; Melo, G. W. B. de; Carranca, Corina

doi:10.4067/s0718-95162017000300002

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is much less evidence on the effect of grass cover crops on recently established vineyards, though under some conditions it can promote vine growth at the beginning of the season, probably due to the presence of organic compounds in the cover crop rhizosphere. Nevertheless, at the end of the cycle, the effect becomes negative because of the high degree of competition for nutrients and water (Brunetto et al, 2017).…”

Section: Other Elementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cover crops in viticulture. A systematic review (1): <br>Implications on soil characteristics and biodiversity in vineyard

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work seeks to synthesise the knowledge on the use of cover crops in vineyards in the last 20 years, emphasising on the one hand, soil characteristics such as nutrition, organic carbon, structure or erosion and, on the other hand, environmental factors such as soil and biodiversity in vineyards, and gas emissions.A systematic review was made using Scopus-index journals for the past 20 years (1999 - 2018). The selection was independently done by two researchers, selecting a total of 272 published papers related to cover crops in the vineyard. Each article was categorised according to its theme and metadata were created, considering all relevant information from an agro-ecological point of view.The use of cover crops has a positive effect on the vineyard by increasing soil organic carbon (SOC), improving water infiltration and aggregate stability, and reducing erosion and greenhouse gases emission to the atmosphere. Furthermore, there is an increase in biodiversity, both in soil and the vineyard. Finally, cover crops do not constitute as a rule a major competition for nutrients to the vines except for nitrogen when grass covers are used. Contrarily, legume cover crops generally increase N in the soil, although its availability for plants is not immediate.This review constitutes an objective tool to help growers when considering the use of cover crops in vineyards that, based in a systematic review, provides relevant information depending on the characteristics of the growing condition of the vineyard.

show abstract

Section: Other Elementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cover crops in viticulture. A systematic review (1): <br>Implications on soil characteristics and biodiversity in vineyard

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.), are used in the interrow space of orchards to dissipate the kinetic energy of rainfall and reduce soil erosion. Throughout tree development, cover crop shoots are frequently cut and deposited on the soil surface contributing to increasing soil organic matter (SOM) content and nutrient cycling (Brunetto et al 2017;.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of Cover Crop Residue Decomposition to Peach Tree Nitrogen Nutrition

Tassinari

Silva

Drescher

et al. 2021

J Soil Sci Plant Nutr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cover crop nitrogen (N) cycling has an important role in agricultural production and contributes to peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] N nutrition. This study evaluated black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb) and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) residue decomposition dynamics, N recovery from cover crop residues, and N compartmentalization in peach tree organs. A 2-year field trial was developed with labeled (3.6-4.0 atom% 15 N excess) cover crop shoot biomass application in a 5-year-old peach orchard. The region's climate is warm temperate (Cfb), and the soil is classified as a Typic Hapludalf. Litter bags with unlabeled shoot residues were also deposited in the orchard to assess biomass, carbon (C), N, lignin, cellulose, and non-structural biomass decomposition dynamics. After 13 months, the leaves, trunk, and roots showed the greatest proportion of N derived from residues (Ndfr) (35.4, 25.1, and 22.4%, respectively) while the greatest concentrations of 15 N and Ndfr occurred in roots <2 mm (0.0376 and 0.94%, respectively). The N derived from cover crop shoots in the second production cycle was similar among tree organs. Ryegrass residues presented the highest decomposition constant (k) values for dry matter, total organic carbon (TOC), cellulose, and lignin. Hence, black oat residues presented a higher half-life (t ½ ) for dry matter, TOC, total N, cellulose, and lignin. The N derived from black oat and ryegrass residues in mature trees was expressively low (<1%) and similar between species. Within organs, the highest Ndfr occurred in peach leaves during the flowering stage, when the greatest residue decomposition rate also occurred. Soil N and plant internal N reserves are the major N sources for newly formed organs, but greater contributions to tree N nutrition may occur with long-term cover crop residue deposition and different plant species.

show abstract

“…Model ML2 predicted no need of N fertilization at high-yield level in 2017, and this finding indicates carryover effects and sufficient nutrient and carbohydrate storage. Fruit trees are very sensitive to shortage of carbohydrates and other resources [54], but they can store nutrients in their tissues over the years and show little response to added nutrients in the following season [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. Nitrogen (N) reserves can be stored in roots, stems and branches (older than 1 year) [19,23].…”

Section: Fruit Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stored N can be redistributed by phloem flow [27], and this phenomenon is commonly observed in temperate fruit trees [66,79]. Soil organic matter and its prior fertilization can also supply nitrogen through the mineralization of organic N, roots and leftover residues [27,82,83].…”

Section: Fruit Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Esmeralda Peach (Prunus persica) Fruit Yield and Quality Response to Nitrogen Fertilization

Nava

Júnior

Parent

et al. 2022

Plants

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘Esmeralda’ is an orange fleshed peach cultivar primarily used for juice extraction and secondarily used for the fresh fruit market. Fruit yield and quality depend on several local environmental and managerial factors, mainly on nitrogen, which must be balanced with other nutrients. Similar to other perennial crops, peach trees show carryover effects of carbohydrates and nutrients and of nutrients stored in their tissues. The aims of the present study are (i) to identify the major sources of seasonal variability in fruit yield and qu Fruit Tree Department of Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010610ality; and (ii) to establish the N dose and the internal nutrient balance to reach high fruit yield and quality. The experiment was conducted from 2014 to 2017 in Southern Brazil and it followed five N treatments (0, 40, 80, 120 and 160 kg N ha−1 year−1). Foliar compositions were centered log-ratio (clr) transformed in order to account for multiple nutrient interactions and allow computing distances between compositions. Based on the feature ranking, chilling hours, degree-days and rainfall were the most influential features. Machine learning models k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and stochastic gradient decent (SGD) performed well on yield and quality indices, and reached accuracy from 0.75 to 1.00. In 2014, fruit production did not respond to added N, and it indicated the carryover effects of previously stored carbohydrates and nutrients. The plant had a quadratic response (p < 0.05) to N addition in 2015 and 2016, which reached maximum yield of 80 kg N ha−1. In 2017, harvest was a failure due to the chilling hours (198 h) and the relatively small number of fruits per tree. Fruit yield and antioxidant content increased abruptly when foliar clrCu was >−5.410. The higher foliar P linearly decreased total titratable acidity and increased pulp firmness when clrP > 0.556. Foliar N concentration range was narrow at high fruit yield and quality. The present results have emphasized the need of accounting for carryover effects, nutrient interactions and local factors in order to predict peach yield and nutrient dosage.

show abstract

Contribution of mineral N to young grapevine in the presence or absence of cover crops

Cited by 9 publications

References 11 publications

Cover crops in viticulture. A systematic review (1): <br>Implications on soil characteristics and biodiversity in vineyard

Cover crops in viticulture. A systematic review (1): <br>Implications on soil characteristics and biodiversity in vineyard

Contribution of Cover Crop Residue Decomposition to Peach Tree Nitrogen Nutrition

Esmeralda Peach (Prunus persica) Fruit Yield and Quality Response to Nitrogen Fertilization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About