2016 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ceidp.2016.7785655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of polymer microstructure to space charge, dielectric properties and electrical conduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For rough abraded, abraded, and smooth abraded surfaces, higher mean charge densities were measured as compared with those obtained for backside surfaces, as can be seen in Figure 8B. This fact might indicate electric field thresholds at approximately 30, 36, and 44 kV/mm, respectively, which can be A B The net charge density decreases for most samples with the poling electric field, which could be an effect related to the sample morphology, as seen in Figure 8 [11,13]. Data for remolded samples deviate from anticipated behavior, which predicts low injection rates.…”
Section: Impact Of Poling Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For rough abraded, abraded, and smooth abraded surfaces, higher mean charge densities were measured as compared with those obtained for backside surfaces, as can be seen in Figure 8B. This fact might indicate electric field thresholds at approximately 30, 36, and 44 kV/mm, respectively, which can be A B The net charge density decreases for most samples with the poling electric field, which could be an effect related to the sample morphology, as seen in Figure 8 [11,13]. Data for remolded samples deviate from anticipated behavior, which predicts low injection rates.…”
Section: Impact Of Poling Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Additional measurements that are not shown in Figure 7 are also included in Figure 8. The net charge density decreases for most samples with the poling electric field, which could be an effect related to the sample morphology, as seen in Figure 8 [11,13]. Data for remolded samples deviate from anticipated behavior, which predicts low injection rates.…”
Section: Impact Of Poling Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the lower range of frequencies (below 1 Hz), a significant rise is observed in both parts of permittivity for the unfilled blend and Sample 0. This phenomenon is generally related to the occurrence of interfacial polarizations or Maxwell-Wagner (space charge) relaxations which can lead to breakdown under high fields [49,50]. It is clear that while the reference samples exhibit a significant amount of these relaxations, the introduction of either modifying agent to the NPs results in a decrease in this low frequency rise, suggesting lower susceptibility to space charge formation as a result of filler surface modification.…”
Section: Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy (Bds)mentioning
confidence: 99%