2012
DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2012.674290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of professional development to standards implementation

Abstract: Teachers' professional development is a key to any educational change and is critical when leading and assimilating change, such as introducing standards into classrooms. A national professional development (PD) framework was developed for the implementation of science standards published by the Israeli Ministry of Education, which was activated before introduction of the standards into the classroom. In this research the authors examined the contribution of PD and instruction to the implementation of science … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is seen across disciplines (Spillane & Zeuli, 1999) and levels of the educational system (Coburn, 2005). Researchers attribute differences in sensemaking to representations of the policy itself (Spillane, 2000) as well as contextual factors that influence sensemaking including communities of practice (Galluci, Coburn 2001), local policy (Spillane, 1999;Desimone, 2013), opportunities for professional development (Coburn, 2001;Klieger & Yakobovitch, 2012), and teachers' conceptions of accountability (Louis et al, 2005). These studies assert that study of reform without consideration of individual sensemaking will be missing a critical component to understanding the process.…”
Section: Reform Representation Sensemaking and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is seen across disciplines (Spillane & Zeuli, 1999) and levels of the educational system (Coburn, 2005). Researchers attribute differences in sensemaking to representations of the policy itself (Spillane, 2000) as well as contextual factors that influence sensemaking including communities of practice (Galluci, Coburn 2001), local policy (Spillane, 1999;Desimone, 2013), opportunities for professional development (Coburn, 2001;Klieger & Yakobovitch, 2012), and teachers' conceptions of accountability (Louis et al, 2005). These studies assert that study of reform without consideration of individual sensemaking will be missing a critical component to understanding the process.…”
Section: Reform Representation Sensemaking and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%