2010
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of proteomics toward solving the fascinating mysteries of the biogenesis of the envelope of Escherichia coli

Abstract: The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria is a complex macromolecular structure that is essential for their viability. Little is known on how the proteins which are secreted to the envelope fold into their unique three-dimensional structure. Several folding factors, including chaperones and protein folding catalysts involved in disulfide bond formation, have been identified in the periplasm. The characterization of these proteins has advanced our understanding of envelope biogenesis, although many fundamenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Integral OM proteins typically span the OM as β-sheets folded in a barrel conformation. Their folding and insertion into the OM is catalyzed by the Bam complex (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) in conjunction with periplasmic chaperones (22). However, because of the extra complexity in their biogenesis, it remains unclear how OM proteins are oxidized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integral OM proteins typically span the OM as β-sheets folded in a barrel conformation. Their folding and insertion into the OM is catalyzed by the Bam complex (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) in conjunction with periplasmic chaperones (22). However, because of the extra complexity in their biogenesis, it remains unclear how OM proteins are oxidized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zhao and coworkers have shown that unfolded OMPs interact with SurA and Skp with much faster kinetics than with DegP, suggesting that SurA and Skp function at the early stage of OMP biogenesis while DegP acts subsequently (5). Depletion of SurA leads to drastically decreased density of OMPs in the outer membrane, but deletion of Skp or DegP does not have a similar effect (6)(7)(8). Two explanations have been proposed for the drastic change of OMP density in the absence of SurA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They share redundant chaperone activities. SurA is the primary chaperone that facilitates membrane insertion of most OMPs, while Skp and DegP scavenge OMP folding intermediates that fall off the SurA pathway and either break them down or prepare them for membrane insertion (5)(6)(7). Recently, Zhao and coworkers have shown that unfolded OMPs interact with SurA and Skp with much faster kinetics than with DegP, suggesting that SurA and Skp function at the early stage of OMP biogenesis while DegP acts subsequently (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Escherichia coli and related enteric bacteria, five periplasmic PPIases have been described: SurA, PpiD, PpiA, FkpA, and FklB (14,15,16). Among these proteins, SurA is particularly well studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%