2003
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical

Abstract: Without relevant visual cues, the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is biased in roll-tilted subjects toward the body axis (Aubert or A-effect). This study focused on the role of the somatosensory system with respect to the SVV and on whether somesthetic cues act through the estimated body tilt. The body cast technology was used to obtain a diffuse tactile stimulation. An increased A-effect was expected because of a greater underestimation of the body position in the body cast. Sixteen subjects placed in a tilt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this was the same arrangement as used in ground-based controls, it may be that tactile cues are more influential in space 22,23 which may have contributed to strengthening the influence of the body cue. 24 However this increase is achieved, it appears that astronauts adapt to a microgravity environment by adjusting the relative weights given to the visual and body cues, thus canceling the increase in visual influence on orientation that would be expected if the weights had retained their on-earth values. A tendency to rely more on the body cue for orientation has been seen in earlier microgravity experiments 9 but has never before been quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this was the same arrangement as used in ground-based controls, it may be that tactile cues are more influential in space 22,23 which may have contributed to strengthening the influence of the body cue. 24 However this increase is achieved, it appears that astronauts adapt to a microgravity environment by adjusting the relative weights given to the visual and body cues, thus canceling the increase in visual influence on orientation that would be expected if the weights had retained their on-earth values. A tendency to rely more on the body cue for orientation has been seen in earlier microgravity experiments 9 but has never before been quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect seems to be less apparent in the sitting condition. These findings suggest that hEDS is associated with changes in the neural processing of somatosensory inputs, which could in turn alter judgment of the SVV (Trousselard et al, 2003). Moreover, one can speculate that, as previously observed in stroke patients, this specific alteration of verticality perception in the standing condition could be associated with postural instability in hEDS patients, and especially with lower limb asymmetry (Bonan et al, 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjustment of such indicators is known to be based on centrally weighted fusion of visual, vestibular, and egocentric references (4), thus enabling a healthy person in an upright position to align an indicator accurately (T0.5 degrees) with the direction of gravity (12). This integration of available sensory information is an adaptive process referred to as "sensory reweighting" (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%