BackgroundAlthough much clinical evidence exists to support a relationship between cancer and HFE genotype, the nature of this relationship and the mechanisms by which HFE function affect tumor progression are still unclear. HFE is an atypical MHC class I molecule that affects immune function [1,2] and HFE polymorphisms disrupt iron metabolism. It is already known that iron metabolism affects tumor progression [3]. Tumors require iron, and have increased ferritin and transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) expression compared to normal tissue and stroma [4]. Clinically, we have previously reported that elevated ferritin, iron storage and transport protein, in serum are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer [5]. Decreased levels of ferroportin in tumors, a protein responsible for iron export from cells, are linked to a more aggressive tumor phenotype in breast cancer [6]. Patients with hereditary hemochromatosis, who experience severe iron overload, showed a risk of liver cancer over two hundred times greater than matched controls. Hereditary hemochromatosis most often arises from mutations in the HFE gene and it has been commonly assumed that the cancers associated with the HFE mutation are related to excess iron accumulation [7].Two HFE variants are extremely common: H63D and C282Y. Of these, H63D is the more common form, seen in approximately 13.5% of people in the United States [8]. C282Y is the rarer form, seen in approximately 5.4% of the United States population [8]. Functionally, both of these result in a loss of normal HFE activity, although their mechanisms differ. H63D leads to a failure of the HFE protein to inhibit the binding of transferrin to the transferrin receptor, whereas C282Y leads to a failure of the HFE protein to reach the cell membrane at all [9]. In both cases, there is evidence that the presence of mutant protein affects cell biology in ways that are not modeled by HFE knockout mouse models. For example, H63D has been shown to increase ER stress, and C282Y has been shown to affect oxidative stress, mitochondrial membrane potential, and iron chelator response [10,11]. Therefore, the present study has chosen a mouse model exhibiting the H67D mutation, which is analogous to human H63D, to capture any effects of mutant protein expression. An investigation of C282Y would be equally valid, but H63D was chosen as a first step because of its comparatively high prevalence in human populations.Because HFE polymorphisms affect so many cell types, it is necessary to perform nuanced studies to understand the mechanisms by which HFE modulates tumor progression. To date, most work has focused on the manipulation of HFE in tumor cells [12] and in population based studies [13][14][15][16]. In the present study, we sought to test the central hypothesis that host HFE genotype modifies tumor progression. This approach contrasts with the majority of existing work because most available models vary the genotype of the cancer cell while using a normal or immunocompromised mouse host. Here, we used the syngene...