2020
DOI: 10.1111/joac.12358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution to a renewed framework for analysing the interactions between family and capitalist agriculture

Abstract: We examine whether current assumptions concerning the declining resilience of family farming and the growing influence of capitalist forms of agricultural production are being confirmed in the cocoa sector of Cameroon and the coffee sector of Kenya. This study is based on surveys of 181 family and capitalist farmers. Our results indicate that the capitalist approach is being consolidated on former colonial coffee estates in Kenya and on the cocoa pioneer front in Cameroon. This study also shows that in areas w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, did the economic situation cause cattle price increases by 120% the rubber fall 88% and the Brasil chestnut 32% (Wallace et al, 2018). This context is influenced by regional agents, challenges the family farming model (Pédelahore et al, 2020), and involves new local contractual relations (Cochet, 2008;Harff & Lamarche, 1998). This reaffirms the influence of the external environment, market forces, the social organization of agents (White, 1981;Liljenberg, 2005;Steiner, 2007;Capelari et al, 2020), the structure of network capitalism and socioeconomic relations (Boltanski & Chiapello, 1999;Granovetter, 2000;Bolčić, 2014), and the dynamics of the cultural, social and economic life of the agents of the RESEXs (Steiner, 2005;Allaire, 2010).…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Conservation and Development Of Resexsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, did the economic situation cause cattle price increases by 120% the rubber fall 88% and the Brasil chestnut 32% (Wallace et al, 2018). This context is influenced by regional agents, challenges the family farming model (Pédelahore et al, 2020), and involves new local contractual relations (Cochet, 2008;Harff & Lamarche, 1998). This reaffirms the influence of the external environment, market forces, the social organization of agents (White, 1981;Liljenberg, 2005;Steiner, 2007;Capelari et al, 2020), the structure of network capitalism and socioeconomic relations (Boltanski & Chiapello, 1999;Granovetter, 2000;Bolčić, 2014), and the dynamics of the cultural, social and economic life of the agents of the RESEXs (Steiner, 2005;Allaire, 2010).…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Conservation and Development Of Resexsmentioning
confidence: 99%