Females of dioecious plant species typically invest more in reproduction than males because they produce seeds, fruits, and associated structures in addition to flowers. If females are unable to compensate by up-regulating rates of photosynthesis or by reproducing less frequently than males, their greater reproductive investment may result in reduced growth or higher mortality. Here we provide evidence of the cost of reproduction in Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae), a dioecious neotropical tree common in lower montane forests of Monteverde, Costa Rica. Over periods of 12-21 years, females grew more slowly than males in a natural population and in two experimental plots where we were able to control for genotype, age, habitat, and reproductive history. Simultaneous measurements of 10 matched pairs of sibling trees of the opposite sex but same age demonstrated that the photosynthetic capacities of females were 13% lower than those of males. Among females, photosynthetic capacity was negatively correlated with fruit production during the most recent reproductive season but not with lifetime fruit production. Sexual size dimorphism in adult O. tenera trees appears to be a nonadaptive consequence of trading off recent reproduction against maintenance of the photosynthetic apparatus, with long-term negative effects on growth.D ioecious plants, species in which male and female flowers are borne on separate individuals, offer an opportunity to assess the costs of reproduction by examining how sexual differences in reproductive effort affect physiology, growth, and life history traits (1, 2). Greater allocation of resources toward reproduction by one sex (typically females) may result in sexspecific differences in the production and consumption of fixed carbon at the whole-plant level, with both short-term consequences (e.g., photosynthetic acclimation) and long-term consequences (e.g., fecundity, growth, and survival). In some dioecious species, the costs of reproduction are reflected in the fact that females are less likely to survive in stressful habitats, which results in spatial segregation of the sexes (3, 4). In other species (5, 6), females can co-occur with males but must defray the costs of reproduction by delaying reproductive maturity or by reproducing less frequently than males (7,8).Although it is now well established that females of many dioecious plant species invest more carbon, nitrogen, and other resources in reproduction than males (2), few studies have linked physiological performance with morphological or demographic consequences or taken into account the influence of recent reproductive effort, much less lifetime reproductive effort, particularly in long-lived trees (9). Moreover, it has been difficult to generalize about the sex-specific costs of reproduction because of differences in the results of laboratory versus field studies and between studies of herbaceous versus woody plants. For example, females tend to be larger than males in herbaceous plants grown in greenhouse experiments (10). In contrast,...