1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999gl010837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution to the climatological study of lightning

Abstract: Abstract.In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Does the explanation lie in a contrast in surface properties (including topography), that translate to a contrast in the instabilities that drive vertical air motion? Or is the contrast in lightning related to aerosol-a ected cloud microphysics, as hypothesized (but not demonstrated) in Michalon et al (1999), McCollum et al (2000), and Williams et al (2002)? A detailed comparative analysis of hydrological and thermodynamic conditions in the Amazon and Congo basins is undertaken to address these questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Does the explanation lie in a contrast in surface properties (including topography), that translate to a contrast in the instabilities that drive vertical air motion? Or is the contrast in lightning related to aerosol-a ected cloud microphysics, as hypothesized (but not demonstrated) in Michalon et al (1999), McCollum et al (2000), and Williams et al (2002)? A detailed comparative analysis of hydrological and thermodynamic conditions in the Amazon and Congo basins is undertaken to address these questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Flash rates are correlated with numerous meteorological variables, including surface temperature [Price, 1993;Williams and Stanfill, 2002;Markson, 2007], convective available potential energy (CAPE) [Rutledge et al, 1992], cloud top height [Price and Rind, 1992;Price et al, 1997], cold-cloud depth [Futyan and Del Genio, 2007;Yoshida et al, 2009], convective precipitation [Meijer et al, 2001], upper tropospheric convective mass flux , integrated convective mass flux [Deierling et al, 2005], updraft vertical velocity or volume Barthe et al, 2010], precipitation ice mass, path, or flux Barthe et al, 2010], and aerosol concentration [Michalon et al, 1999;Andreae et al, 2004;Altaratz et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2011].…”
Section: Appendix A: Lightning Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud top heights may be large without active updrafts and hence without active lightning. Later, other approaches were developed based on a combination of latent heat release and cloud-top-height (Flatøy and Hov, 1997), convective precipitation rate (CPR) (Meijer et al, 2001;Allen and Pickering, 2002), convective available potential energy (CAPE) (Choi et al, 2005), land-ocean cloud CCN spectrum differences (Michalon et al, 1999;Jourdain and Hauglustaine, 2001), or convectively induced updraft velocity (UPD) (Allen et al, 2000;Grewe et al, 2001;Allen and Pickering, 2002;Kurz and Grewe, 2002). Besides a few observations (Lhermitte and Krehbiel, 1979), conceptual flash models indicate that flash rates are correlated with a high power (order of six) of the strength of storm updrafts (Baker et al, 1995(Baker et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Alternative Lightning Parameterisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%