1988
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.97.2.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
192
1
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
14
192
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that nicotine reduced the effects of nicotine deprivation on drinking. Some studies find that nicotine deprivation increases drinking behavior (e.g., Palfai et al 2000), and theories of behavioral choice (Vuchinich and Tucker 1988) suggest that nicotine deprivation may increase the incentive value for alcohol because of the lack of availability of nicotine. In support of this hypothesis, subjects who reported greater tobacco craving in the placebo patch condition exhibited shorter latencies to drink.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that nicotine reduced the effects of nicotine deprivation on drinking. Some studies find that nicotine deprivation increases drinking behavior (e.g., Palfai et al 2000), and theories of behavioral choice (Vuchinich and Tucker 1988) suggest that nicotine deprivation may increase the incentive value for alcohol because of the lack of availability of nicotine. In support of this hypothesis, subjects who reported greater tobacco craving in the placebo patch condition exhibited shorter latencies to drink.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews of the literature suggest that both predictions have been supported by numerous laboratory-based experimental studies (cf. Carroll, 1996;Griffiths et al, 1980;Vuchinich & Tucker, 1988). Vuchinich and Tucker (1996) pointed out that the application of the behavioral choice framework to research in the natural environment is still in the early stages and that important empirical and design issues need to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High rates of drug use are most likely in contexts devoid of substance-free sources of reinforcement, and drug use will generally decrease if access to alternative reinforcers is increased (Higgins, Heil, & Plebani-Lussier, 2003). These predictions have received considerable empirical support through controlled laboratory research with a variety of species (e.g., rats, monkeys, humans), drugs (e.g., cocaine, ethanol, heroin, nicotine), and nondrug reinforcers (e.g., food, money, saccharin, video game playing; see reviews by Carroll, 1996;Higgins et al, 2003;Vuchinich & Tucker, 1988). Herrnstein's (1970) matching law provides a means of quantifying the reinforcing value of qualitatively different reinforcers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%