1982
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(82)90039-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions from coal and industrial materials to mercury in air, rainwater and snow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mercury Concentrations and Depositions. The results of monitoring (weekly) mercury in precipitation at seven monitoring sites for 1990-1992 are shown in Figure 1 and Table 4. In general, these mercury concentrations and/or depositions are lower than those found previously in Minnesota (1, 3,13), England (15), and the majority of Scandinavian sites that were highly variable (16) and approximately the same as those observed in Canada (17) and Italy (9). The apparent decrease in values observed for Minnesota may be due to a change in sampling procedures and/or to a number of actions taken by that state since 1989 to reduce or eliminate mercury emissions from products such as batteries, paints, fungicides, switches, and light bulbs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Mercury Concentrations and Depositions. The results of monitoring (weekly) mercury in precipitation at seven monitoring sites for 1990-1992 are shown in Figure 1 and Table 4. In general, these mercury concentrations and/or depositions are lower than those found previously in Minnesota (1, 3,13), England (15), and the majority of Scandinavian sites that were highly variable (16) and approximately the same as those observed in Canada (17) and Italy (9). The apparent decrease in values observed for Minnesota may be due to a change in sampling procedures and/or to a number of actions taken by that state since 1989 to reduce or eliminate mercury emissions from products such as batteries, paints, fungicides, switches, and light bulbs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…They proposed the following reaction: 2HgCl2(g) + H2(g) « Hg2Cl2(s) + 2HCl(g) (8) on the basis of HCI formation and that no elemental mercury was found in their study. The H2(g) was assumed to be hydrogen occluded in steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple computer-controlled data acquisition system collects and stores temperature and combustion parameter data during the experiments (Figure 2). furnace, (2) flue gas duct, (3) propane burner, (4) cooling air jacket, (5) trace gas inlet, (6) fabric filter, (7) sampling probes, (8) induced draught ejector. Key: (1) Hg°line, (2) Hg(tot) line (3) ice box with gas/liquid separators, (4) three-way valve, (5) mercury analyzer, (6) recorder, (7) pump for gas (1 L/min), (8) gas flow meter, (9) drain valve, (10) drain, (11) pump for liquid (2 mL/min), ( 12) container with acidic Sn(II) solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of source apportionment of mercury content of dust fallout have shown that construction activities was came out as major contributor with 30% with soils of 32%. It has been reported earlier that cemetitious material has contain 0.02 g of mercury (ACC, 2007) and Airey (1997) has reported that mercury content has been found in the range of 0.03-0.46 ppm in ingredients of cement material. Vehicle exhaust and industrial location of SIltara have also shown significant contribution in mercury content of dust fall in all atmospheric levels of residential receptor (R-1).…”
Section: Source Signatures Of Dust Fallout and Mercury Content Using mentioning
confidence: 91%