Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control

Abstract

Purpose To better define the contributions of somatosensory and auditory feedback in vocal motor control, a laryngeal perturbation experiment was conducted with and without masking of auditory feedback. Method Eighteen native speakers of English produced a sustained vowel while their larynx was physically and externally displaced on a subset of trials. For the condition with auditory masking, speech-shaped noise was played via earphones at 90 dB SPL. Responses to the laryngeal perturbation were compared to responses by the same participants to an auditory perturbation experiment that involved a 100-cent downward shift in fundamental frequency ( f o ). Responses were also examined in relation to a measure of auditory acuity. Results Compensatory responses to the laryngeal perturbation were observed with and without auditory masking. The level of compensation was greatest in the laryngeal perturbation condition without auditory masking, followed by the condition with auditory masking; the level of compensation was smallest in the auditory perturbation experiment. No relationship was found between the degree of compensation to auditory versus laryngeal perturbations, and the variation in responses in both perturbation experiments was not related to auditory acuity. Conclusions The findings indicate that somatosensory and auditory feedback control mechanisms work together to compensate for laryngeal perturbations, resulting in the greatest degree of compensation when both sources of feedback are available. In contrast, these two control mechanisms work in competition in response to auditory perturbations, resulting in an overall smaller degree of compensation. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12559628

Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one’s own voice pitch sensitivity

“…Indeed, the two systems should have reciprocal connections to perform a well-organized process of error detection and correction successfully. A very recent study 43 reached the exact same conclusion. The speech error detection system has a complex nature with many subcomponents involved, and likely under the supervision of shared sensorimotor brain areas responsible for the functional coupling between speech perception and production systems 65 .…”

“…On the other hand, evidence for a lack of relationship has been reported by Feng et al 40 for the correlation between adaptation to F1 manipulation and auditory acuity for F1, Cai et al 41 for the correlation between speaker’s JNDs toward the F1 manipulation and compensatory responses to F1 manipulations, Abur et al 42 for the correlation between adaptation to F0 manipulation and F0 JND, and most recently, Smith et al 43 for the correlation between compensatory responses to F0 manipulation and F0 JND.…”

Brain adaptation following various unilateral vocal fold paralysis treatments: A magnetic resonance imaging based longitudinal case series

“…The sensory receptors of the muscles of the glottic level would recover sensations similar to those of a healthy voice due to the restoration of the subglottic pressure during phonation and/or due to the vibro-tactile stimulation due to the contact between the paralyzed vocal fold with the healthy vocal fold. Furthermore, auditory perception of clearer and/or louder sounding voice is restored as a result of this early injection ( Smith et al, 2020 ). Restoring feedbacks could therefore play a role in the peripheral reinnervation process, but it remains unclear how these processes occur.…”

“…Auditory feedback may also play a role. The study of Smith et al (2020) , which investigated the effect of disrupting auditory feedback and proprioceptive feedback on the laryngeal compensatory response, concluded that when both sources of feedback were available and the information received by these two perceptual systems was congruent, the compensatory response was greater. Although this study was not conducted in patients with voice disorders, the presence of auditory feedback may potentiate the effect of proprioceptive feedback detected in the voice-related nuclei in the brainstem.…”

Audiovisual incongruence differentially impacts left and right hemisphere sensorimotor oscillations: Potential applications to production

“…However, the influence of auditory and somatosensory feedback signals on speech motor control are frequently probed in isolation, a critical omission given that speech gives rise to multimodal sensory feedback signals which must be evaluated and compared against each other. A recent study by Smith et al [ 9 ] probed the influence of convergent and divergent feedback signals on speech motor control, demonstrating dynamic patterns of adaptive behavior in response to unimodal and multimodal sensory feedback perturbations. However, it remains unclear how these multimodal feedback signals are integrated in the brain and how these integration processes influence sensorimotor activity supporting speech processing [ 10 , 11 ].…”