2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60204-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of biofilm and suspended sludge to nitrogen transformation and nitrous oxide emission in hybrid sequencing batch system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Todt and D€ orsch (2015) found an emission factor ranging between 0.7% and 8.5% in a pure MBBR system; Kong et al (2013) reported a mean emission factor equal to 2.7% in an MBBR operated with intermittent aeration; Lo et al (2010) found an emission factor equal to 21% of nitrogen load in an IFAS system operated with intermittent aeration. However, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Todt and D€ orsch (2015) found an emission factor ranging between 0.7% and 8.5% in a pure MBBR system; Kong et al (2013) reported a mean emission factor equal to 2.7% in an MBBR operated with intermittent aeration; Lo et al (2010) found an emission factor equal to 21% of nitrogen load in an IFAS system operated with intermittent aeration. However, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a couple of studies have been carried so far (among others Lo et al, 2010;Ma et al, 2015;Todt and D€ orsch, 2015), indicating that significant knowledge gaps still exist. As far as the present authors are aware of, no studies are available on N 2 O emission from IFAS system coupled to MBR and more knowledge is therefore needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NH 4 + -N and TN removal efficiencies were 96.6% and 77.2%, respectively, with an average COD intra efficiency of 80.1% ( Fig.2B and C). The high COD intra led to efficient N and P removal in the SBR by facilitating endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (SND efficiency was 47.7%, calculated by Lo et al (2010)). …”
Section: C N and P Removal Performance Of The Sndpr-pd Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, a hybrid environment with an aerobic environment on the surface and an anoxic/anaerobic microenvironment inside the biofilm are formed. 15 The performance was affected by many operating factors, such as salinity, 16 synthetic toxic organics, 17 influent nitrogen concentration and DO condition, 18 but efficient SND performance was achieved in SBBR systems for saline wastewater treatment. However, few studies have focused on the performance and microbial pathway of SND in SBBR systems treating saline wastewater with coastal seawater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%