2009
DOI: 10.5324/nje.v10i1.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of food categories to absolute nutrient intake and between-person variation within a representative sample of 2677 Norwegian men and women

Abstract: Telefon: 22 24 90 66 telefaks: 22 24 90 91 e-post: lars.johansson@sef.no SAMMENDRAGKunnskap om endringer i matvarenes sammensetning og befolkningens kosthold er grunnleggende for utforming og oppfølging av en helsefremmende mat-og ernaeringspolitikk. Dagens system for overvåking av kostholdet bygger først og fremst på en matvaredatabase og opplysninger om forbruket av matvarer fra tre typer datasett; matforsyningsstatistikk, forbruksundersøkelser og kostholdsundersøkelser. Det avgis årlig en vurdering av utvik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1996). Stepwise regression analyses have been applied to the Norwegian food intake data to identify the most discriminating food items (Mosdøl et al . 2000).…”
Section: How Many Food Questions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1996). Stepwise regression analyses have been applied to the Norwegian food intake data to identify the most discriminating food items (Mosdøl et al . 2000).…”
Section: How Many Food Questions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of food categories that must be included in a FFQ in order to capture the variation between persons within a population varies for different foods and nutrients Mark et al 1996). Stepwise regression analyses have been applied to the Norwegian food intake data to identify the most discriminating food items (Mosdøl et al 2000). Thus we feel confident that our food questions cover the major foods and food patterns representative of the majority of the Norwegian population.…”
Section: How Many Food Questions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questions covered intake of bread (slices per day for three categories), bread spreads (no portion size; response categories of 'seldom/never', '1-2 times/week', '3-4 times/week', '5-7 times/week' and 'several times/day'), dinner dishes, sauces/dressings, cakes/sweets, fats (no portion size; response categories of 'seldom/never', '1-3 times/month', '1-2 times/week', '3-4 times/week' and '5-7 times/week'), fruit, vegetables (no portion size; response categories of 'seldom/never', '1-3 times/month', '1-3 times/week', '4-6 times/week', '1-2 times/day' and '$3 times/day') and milk, fruit juice, soft drinks (in glasses; response categories of 'seldom/never', '1-6/week', '1/day', '2-3/day' and '$4/day'). The selection of food items was based upon previous analyses of a representative Norwegian sample identifying items contributing the most to between-person variability in energy or nutrient intake (21) . The food frequency questions have previously been validated against intake of the matching food/food group based on a 14 d diet diary (22) .…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, known that information about the frequency of intake of a limited number of food items explains a large part of the between-person variation in nutrient intake (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). This means that there is a relatively high correlation coefficient between the nutrient intake estimated from a few food items and that estimated from a comprehensive dietary survey method covering the intake of many food items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%