2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of foot muscles and plantar fascia morphology to foot posture

Abstract: The medial plantar structures and the plantar fascia appear to be the major contributors to static foot posture. Elucidating the individual contribution of multiple muscles of the foot could provide insight about their role in the foot posture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
30
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the first study to describe a weight bearing assessment of IFM morphology that is easily This study is the first to report that body size and foot posture explained between 25-38% of the variance in measurements of FIS thickness. Whilst ABH thickness and CSA was not related to body size, foot posture explained between 20-40% of the variance in measurements of CSA, which supports previous reports [20,27,28]. What remains unclear is whether the association between IFM morphology and foot posture is due to anatomical dimensions (body size) with some studies reporting significant associations to foot posture even when controlling for body size [27], whilst others report that associations become non-significant when controlling for body size [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is the first study to describe a weight bearing assessment of IFM morphology that is easily This study is the first to report that body size and foot posture explained between 25-38% of the variance in measurements of FIS thickness. Whilst ABH thickness and CSA was not related to body size, foot posture explained between 20-40% of the variance in measurements of CSA, which supports previous reports [20,27,28]. What remains unclear is whether the association between IFM morphology and foot posture is due to anatomical dimensions (body size) with some studies reporting significant associations to foot posture even when controlling for body size [27], whilst others report that associations become non-significant when controlling for body size [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The PF plays a significant role in both static and dynamic function of the foot by supporting the arch (Boussouar et al, ; Guo et al, ; Orner et al, ; Park et al, ). Originating from CB in close proximity to the AT and expanding toward the metatarsal bones where it inserts, the PF may also highly influence the biomechanical properties of the surrounding structures (Aydogan et al, ; Angin et al, ). Anatomical variations of the origin of the PF may therefore affect the foot's biomechanical properties with potential significance in foot pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologies of the PF may not only highly influence the functional properties of the connective tissue itself, but also the overall biomechanical properties of the foot (Cheung et al, ; Aydogan et al, ; Angin et al, ; Guo et al, ). However, it is important to notify that pathologies involving the surrounding structures may also significantly alter the functional properties of the PF (Li and Muehleman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is difficult to assess the function of intrinsic muscles of the foot. Recently, the intrinsic muscles of the foot were assessed in flat feet by ultrasonography 10,11) . However, therapy that changes both the thickness and the cross sectional area of the intrinsic muscles of the foot is controversial, and the relationship of intrinsic foot musculature and kinematics of the foot during gait is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%