The Oxford Handbook of Accurate Personality Judgment 2020
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190912529.013.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of Nonverbal Cues to the Accurate Judgment of Personality Traits

Abstract:

This chapter summarizes research on nonverbal expressions of behavior (nonverbal cues) and how they contribute to the accuracy of personality judgments. First, it presents a conceptual overview of relevant nonverbal cues in the domains of facial expressions, body language, paralanguage, and appearance as well as approaches to assess these cues on different levels of aggregation. It then summarizes research on the validity of nonverbal cues (what kind of nonverbal cues are good indicators of personality?) an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, all necessary information is available. Seventh, we did not collect perceiver ratings of personality based on the voice recordings and therefore we cannot draw conclusions about whether people use voice pitch as a cue to form social impressions about other people's personality (e.g., Breil et al, 2021) or whether perceptions based on voice pitch are accurate. Investigating personality perceptions and their accuracy based on voice pitch might be another interesting avenue of future research.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, all necessary information is available. Seventh, we did not collect perceiver ratings of personality based on the voice recordings and therefore we cannot draw conclusions about whether people use voice pitch as a cue to form social impressions about other people's personality (e.g., Breil et al, 2021) or whether perceptions based on voice pitch are accurate. Investigating personality perceptions and their accuracy based on voice pitch might be another interesting avenue of future research.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to classic ACs, multiple speed assessments revolve around a larger number of very short interpersonal simulations that elicit overt behavior in a standardized way. The basic idea behind multiple speed assessments is that (a) even brief behavioral observations provide assessors with enough information to make relatively accurate judgments (Breil, Osterholz, et al, 2021;Funder, 2012;Ingold et al, 2018) and (b) by increasing the number of situations/exercises (i.e., sampling behavior across a variety of contexts), the reliability and validity of the overall ratings increase (i.e., principle of aggregation; Epstein, 1983).…”
Section: Implications For Assessment Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By weighing cues when inferring targets' individual traits (cue utilization), perceivers derive judgments for multiple social dimensions. A wide range of static physical appearance and more dynamic nonverbal cue differences have been found to predict target evaluations (see Breil et al, 2021, for an overview). However, individual differences in the static cue of facial attractiveness and in the dynamic cue of facial expressiveness (i.e., smiling) have been found to be the most powerful predictors of evaluations of targets in a large variety of judgment contexts (e.g., Back et al, 2011;Feingold, 1992;Krumhuber et al, 2007;Lau, 1982;Naumann et al, 2009;Reis et al, 1990;Todorov et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Influence Of Target Cue Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%