1966
DOI: 10.1037/h0023890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of twin research to psychology.

Abstract: AFTER REVIEWING SOME CRITICISMS OF THE TWIN METHOD, PARTIAL REPLIES TO THESE ARE SUGGESTED. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF TWIN DATA ARE DISCUSSED, INCLUDING SOME NEW IDEAS ABOUT MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF TWIN DATA. THE REMAINDER OF THE PAPER SUMMARIZES RECENT TWIN STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL AND SENSORY VARIABLES, PERCEPTUAL TASKS, MOTOR SKILL, COGNITIVE VARIABLES, AND PERSONALITY. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR GENETICS ARE GIVEN. (4 P. REF.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the view first ventured by Galton in 1875 and later confirmed by Newman, Freeman & Holzinger (1937) that the handwriting of identical twins appeared to be no more alike than that of fraternal twins (Vandenberg, 1966).…”
Section: Zygositysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This supports the view first ventured by Galton in 1875 and later confirmed by Newman, Freeman & Holzinger (1937) that the handwriting of identical twins appeared to be no more alike than that of fraternal twins (Vandenberg, 1966).…”
Section: Zygositysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Despite a sometimes well-founded pessimism about the effectiveness of earlier efforts to contribute to an understanding of the roles of heredity and environment in human behaviour generally, greater sophistication about the complexities of genetics and personality measurement has resulted in significant advances in human behaviour genetics which are not generally appreciated (Vandenberg, 1965). Recent overviews of interest to developmental psychologists may be found in Gottesman (1963b), McClearn (1964), and Vandenberg (1966). The present paper is a preliminary report in a broader research programme into the origins of individual differences in both normal and abnormal personality characteristics (Gottesman, 1963a(Gottesman, , 1965Gottesman and Shields, 1966a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However Lind et al (2009) did not find an association between polymorphisms in CHRM2 and g factors extracted from an assortment of cognitive tests in three independent samples. Despite problems in replicating effects of specific genes on behavioral measures (Chabris et al, 2013) methods are beginning to be developed that may account for traits that have previously been shown to be heritable by methods such as twin studies (Vandenberg, 1966). One issue concerns the selection of the appropriate phenotype since combining genetically unrelated measures may obscure results.…”
Section: Sources Of Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%