2016
DOI: 10.3989/mc.2016.10215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions to the study of porosity in fly ash-based geopolymers. Relationship between degree of reaction, porosity and compressive strength

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The main contribution of this paper relates to the development of a systematic study involving a set of parameters which could potentially have an impact on geopolymer properties: curing temperature, type of activating solution, alkali metal in solution, incorporation of slag (Ca source) and type of slag used. The microstructures, degrees of reaction, porosities and compressive strengths of geopolymers have been evaluated. Geopolymers prepared with soluble silicate presented a more compacted and close… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, higher percentages of RHA provide a higher concentration of soluble silica, which hinders the geopolymerization process , resulting in more unreacted or partially reacted material particles (as observed from Figure ) and thus limiting the pore refinement/filler effect. Moreover, a low reactivity of RHA in comparison with FA may be another possible cause of low geopolymerization reaction rate . These test results are in good agreement with the strength development of brick samples, as the more the void volume within the bricks, the higher the water absorption rate and the poorer the brick strength is.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Additionally, higher percentages of RHA provide a higher concentration of soluble silica, which hinders the geopolymerization process , resulting in more unreacted or partially reacted material particles (as observed from Figure ) and thus limiting the pore refinement/filler effect. Moreover, a low reactivity of RHA in comparison with FA may be another possible cause of low geopolymerization reaction rate . These test results are in good agreement with the strength development of brick samples, as the more the void volume within the bricks, the higher the water absorption rate and the poorer the brick strength is.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Figures 4e and 4f show mechanical performance in mortars AAFA. Strength was much lower in these mortars than in the other two at all the ages studied (44). In the 28 day specimens, 100% replacement of siliceous aggregate by R or H aggregates induces a steep decline in compressive strength (72% and 56% for R and H respectively).…”
Section: Mechanical Performancementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, the XRD peak between 20° and 40° is higher for the water-glass activating solution than that for the hydroxide activating solution. Although both activating solutions have a pH of 14, the hydroxide activating solution yields a lower reactivity than the silicate activating solution during the geopolymerization reaction [ 22 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%