2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2011.6181603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control and design of a 3 DOF fish robot ‘ICHTUS’

Abstract: Recently, there is a rising interest on studying fish-like underwater robots because of real fish's great maneuverability and high energy efficiency. However, the researches about the fish-like underwater robots have not been done so much and there are still diverse problems in respect of using of the fish robot in the real environment such as in the river. For example, the fish robot has a short operating time and cannot move narrow passage such as swimming between aquatic plants. Therefore, this paper mainly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since various real-life environmental tasks require different characteristics, many groups have developed different types of robotic fish [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. To achieve high agility in water, some robotic fish, including soft-body and multiple-link tails [14][15][16][17], use multiple actuators or a compliant actuation mechanism to make the body-tail more flexible. For example, Nakabayashi et al investigated robotic fish propulsion using a fin connected with a variable-effective-length spring [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since various real-life environmental tasks require different characteristics, many groups have developed different types of robotic fish [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. To achieve high agility in water, some robotic fish, including soft-body and multiple-link tails [14][15][16][17], use multiple actuators or a compliant actuation mechanism to make the body-tail more flexible. For example, Nakabayashi et al investigated robotic fish propulsion using a fin connected with a variable-effective-length spring [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is known, many kinds of fish perform high-efficiently locomotion and maneuvering in the water. Propulsion efficiencies of the rotary propeller AUVs are limited below 70%, while the swimming mechanism of a real fish is 20% more efficient than rotary propellers [6]. In addition, the turning radius of propellers is big and speed performances are low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the turning radius of propellers is big and speed performances are low. Therefore, this kind of propulsion is more noisy and ineffective than bio-inspired systems [6,7]. These advantages have great benefit for marine applications and fish-like robots have evolved to provide versatile solutions for a wide variety of underwater applications, such as undersea investigation, pollution detection, deep sea monitoring and mapping, military operations and protections, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ichthyology, more than 85% of fish swim by bending their bodies and/or caudal fins (BCF) and about 15% of fish swim by median and/or pectoral fins (MPF). Also, Carangiform swimming mode is the most common BCF locomotion type of the fish which uses undulatory motions [18][19][20]. These biological properties indicate that BCF type Carangiform robot model is an appropriate approach for AUV design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%