2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control and operation strategy design of ITER coil power supply system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the FP phase, the magnetic control system [5] will generate commands to the CS/PF coil power supply system (CPSS) [6] to provide the required electromagnetic plasma breakdown conditions in the breakdown region, to sustain the plasma after breakdown during the burn-through phase and control the plasma current, radial plasma position, and plasma shape for a nearly circular plasma limited on the inboard or possibly the outboard temporary stainless steel poloidal limiters (figure 2). Disruption force limits on the attachments of these temporary limiters (TL) (see TL in figure 4) to the vacuum vessel (VV) require control algorithms to ensure that I p < 1 MA at half the nominal TF, 2.65 T at R = 6.2 m. In the FP phase, the CPSS of the superconducting coils CS1U and L, CS2U and L, CS3U and L, PF1 and PF6 will have only one converter installed out of two and the vertical stability circuit VS1 using PF2-PF5 will only operate at 1/3 voltage with two converters out of six installed.…”
Section: Magnetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the FP phase, the magnetic control system [5] will generate commands to the CS/PF coil power supply system (CPSS) [6] to provide the required electromagnetic plasma breakdown conditions in the breakdown region, to sustain the plasma after breakdown during the burn-through phase and control the plasma current, radial plasma position, and plasma shape for a nearly circular plasma limited on the inboard or possibly the outboard temporary stainless steel poloidal limiters (figure 2). Disruption force limits on the attachments of these temporary limiters (TL) (see TL in figure 4) to the vacuum vessel (VV) require control algorithms to ensure that I p < 1 MA at half the nominal TF, 2.65 T at R = 6.2 m. In the FP phase, the CPSS of the superconducting coils CS1U and L, CS2U and L, CS3U and L, PF1 and PF6 will have only one converter installed out of two and the vertical stability circuit VS1 using PF2-PF5 will only operate at 1/3 voltage with two converters out of six installed.…”
Section: Magnetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%