2018
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control charts with random interarrival times between successive samplings

Abstract: In the classical setup used in process monitoring, the times between the collection of successive plotted samples are considered as nonrandom. However, in several real-life applications, it seems plausible to assume that the time needed to collect the necessary information for plotting a point in the control chart has a stochastic nature. Under this scenario, instead of focusing on the number of points plotted on the chart until an out-of-control signal is initiated, the appropriate statistic to look at is the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in this article are still limited, and diverse extensions of the modeling and analysis would emerge:1.Our model can be combined into problems involving both monitoring and replacement encountered in industrial problems like replacement of deteriorating systems 80,81 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in this article are still limited, and diverse extensions of the modeling and analysis would emerge:1.Our model can be combined into problems involving both monitoring and replacement encountered in industrial problems like replacement of deteriorating systems 80,81 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the detection ability of the control charts, run‐length properties such as average run‐length (ARL), the SD of run‐length (SDRL) and median of run‐length (MDRL) are evaluated. The ARL is a well‐known measure and defined as the average number of points until a point falls outside the limits 44 . Further, it is categorized into IC average run‐length (ARL 0 ) and OOC average run‐length (ARL 1 ).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase‐type distributions have been widely used in reliability and quality. See, for example, Neuts and Meier, 10 Montoro‐Cazorla and Perez‐Ocon, 11 Koutras and Rakitsiz 12 . Recently, Alkaff and Qomarudin 13 presented a framework for modeling and analysis of system reliability using phase‐type closure properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%