2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2016.7522343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control flow graph visualization in compiled software engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since CFGs capture syntactic and semantic features of the code, they are better at resisting changes in the code that manipulate source code in very minor ways, while not affecting the functionality of the program. For this reason, control flow graphs have been used in static analysis [31], fuzzing and test coverage tools [32], execution profiling [33,34], binary code analysis [35], malware analysis [36], and anomaly analysis [37].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CFGs capture syntactic and semantic features of the code, they are better at resisting changes in the code that manipulate source code in very minor ways, while not affecting the functionality of the program. For this reason, control flow graphs have been used in static analysis [31], fuzzing and test coverage tools [32], execution profiling [33,34], binary code analysis [35], malware analysis [36], and anomaly analysis [37].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%