Assistive Technologies 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-09631-7.00007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control Interfaces for Assistive Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of assistive technology have sought to focus more on practical solutions to overcome barriers in access to communication technology for people with disabilities. The human activity assistive technology (HAAT) model (Cook & Polgar, 2013) describes an integrated system composed of the ‘consumer’ (the person with the disability), their activities, their context (social and physical environment) and the technology itself. The HAAT Model and it is extension the comprehensive assistive technology (CAT) model (Hersh & Johnson, 2008) focuses on a holistic and simultaneous evaluation of these four interrelated components, emphasising that a focus only on the technology or the person with the disability is likely to be ineffective in enhancing communication experiences or improving health and wellbeing outcomes.…”
Section: Multimedia Advocacy and ‘Communication’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of assistive technology have sought to focus more on practical solutions to overcome barriers in access to communication technology for people with disabilities. The human activity assistive technology (HAAT) model (Cook & Polgar, 2013) describes an integrated system composed of the ‘consumer’ (the person with the disability), their activities, their context (social and physical environment) and the technology itself. The HAAT Model and it is extension the comprehensive assistive technology (CAT) model (Hersh & Johnson, 2008) focuses on a holistic and simultaneous evaluation of these four interrelated components, emphasising that a focus only on the technology or the person with the disability is likely to be ineffective in enhancing communication experiences or improving health and wellbeing outcomes.…”
Section: Multimedia Advocacy and ‘Communication’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social context refers to the interaction with others within the environment (23), including aspects such as attitudes and the social acceptability of the AT. Interestingly, the child's attitude towards the AT was viewed as most influential factor pertaining to the social context and was ranked 13 th overall.…”
Section: Environmental Factors: Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The institutional context refers to "larger organisations in society" (23), such as the policies of the South African Department of Health or Department of Education. The financial provision of the institutional context (through tender policy in the public sector and medical aids in the private sector) was found to be the most influential factor in the institutional context, ranked in 17 th position overall.…”
Section: Environmental Factors: Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last two decades various alternatives to the standard mouse have been developed to enable people with MIs to access graphical user interfaces (GUIs). These assistive technologies (ATs) seek to meet the special needs of this heterogeneous group of users who cannot grip or control standard mice [4] [5]. The most commonly used ATs to overcome this issue include specific alternative pointing devices (e.g., trackball or joystick), software applications such as mouse keys that enable the use of keyboards as an alternative to a mouse, or devices to support alternative manipulation (e.g., head wands or mouth sticks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%