IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society. IECON 02
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2002.1182853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control loop performance analysis over networked control systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main issue from the perspective of design of the supervision processes is how to design delaytolerant supervision for closed loop control. [3] studies synchronous versus asynchronous actuation in NCS where delays are expected, concluding that asynchronous approaches can improve the performance of control loops in such contexts. Knowledge and correct estimation of delays is pointed out as an important factor to improve the approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main issue from the perspective of design of the supervision processes is how to design delaytolerant supervision for closed loop control. [3] studies synchronous versus asynchronous actuation in NCS where delays are expected, concluding that asynchronous approaches can improve the performance of control loops in such contexts. Knowledge and correct estimation of delays is pointed out as an important factor to improve the approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main issue from the perspective of design of the supervision processes is how to design delay-tolerant supervision for closed loop control. Yepez et al [2002] study synchronous versus asynchronous actuation in NCS where delays are expected, concluding that asynchronous approaches can improve the performance of control loops in such contexts. Knowledge and correct estimation of delays is pointed out as an important factor to improve the approaches.…”
Section: Networked Control Systems Issues and Performance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the networked predictive controller can actively compensate for the constant network delay. Since the controller parameters do not need to be changed, the network delay can be ignored during the design of the PI controller, which is quite different from the traditional method (taking into account the delays in the controller design stage or designing a communication protocol that minimizes delay [15]). …”
Section: ) Constant Network Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there exists a positive definite matrix such that (15) for all and , then the closed-loop system (14) is stable for all random delay [16], [21].…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of the Npc Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%