2012 American Control Conference (ACC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2012.6315120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of floating wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller pitches the blades, due to a change of the relative wind speed seen by the rotor, originated from a fore-aft oscillation of the platform. This pitching reduces the thrust and can eventually yield a fore-aft system instability as shown by [2][3][4], among others. The effect was experimentally shown for the semi-submersible FOWT concept of this work in [5].…”
Section: Coupled Aero-hydro-servo-elastic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The controller pitches the blades, due to a change of the relative wind speed seen by the rotor, originated from a fore-aft oscillation of the platform. This pitching reduces the thrust and can eventually yield a fore-aft system instability as shown by [2][3][4], among others. The effect was experimentally shown for the semi-submersible FOWT concept of this work in [5].…”
Section: Coupled Aero-hydro-servo-elastic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is due to a decrease in rotor thrust at constant rotor speed as the wind speed increases. This can then lead directly to tower fore-aft oscillation, hence, decreased tower axial fatigue life if not controlled, as illustrated in Figure 1 [4]. Fixed turbines can avoid the negative damping effect without a loss in performance as the natural frequency of the blade pitch control system is lower than the first resonance modes of the tower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tower oscillation propagation in a pitch-to-feather horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) due to the negative damping cycle. Adapted from Reference[4] Reprinted with permission [van der Veen]; 2012, American Control Conference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New concepts have to be devised particularly for collective blade pitch control to regulate the rotor speed because of the known negative damping of the platform pitch motion at low frequencies introduced by the wind variations at these frequencies . Based on van der Veen et al (2012), there are mainly four possibilities to face this problem by feedback control: A straightforward approach is to lower the closed-loop bandwidth of the pitch controller under the platform pitch frequency as done by Jonkman (2007) and Larsen and Hanson (2007). The second possibility is to use acceleration measurements to damp the pitch motion (Lackner and Rotea, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%