2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of forced shock-wave oscillations and separated boundary layer interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research status in this field also indicates that the vane-type VG shapes are superior in performance when compared to the ramp/wedge-type VGs and, therefore, more innovative designs need to be looked into to match the effectiveness of the former. Although nothing concrete could be ascertained about control location, a rough estimate indicates that this distance is to be somewhere between (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) x/ h (where x is the distance of the control location from the interaction).…”
Section: Thematic Issue On Supersonic Flow Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research status in this field also indicates that the vane-type VG shapes are superior in performance when compared to the ramp/wedge-type VGs and, therefore, more innovative designs need to be looked into to match the effectiveness of the former. Although nothing concrete could be ascertained about control location, a rough estimate indicates that this distance is to be somewhere between (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) x/ h (where x is the distance of the control location from the interaction).…”
Section: Thematic Issue On Supersonic Flow Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, frequency forcing close to the natural shedding frequency reduced separation, while the latter increased at high frequency (corresponding to an acoustic-mode operation of the jet). Passive and active (by suction) techniques for the control of shock wave oscillations and separated boundary layer interaction in a transonic channel flow were investigated by Galli et al [23] who showed that passive control had no effect on shock unsteadiness. LES simulations of Franck and Colonius [24] confirmed a slight loss of control effectiveness when comparing the results for the same control parameters at low Mach numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of experimental and numerical studies [2,3,[5][6][7][8] have implemented a variable geometry second throat to investigate the effects of downstream periodic pressure perturbations on shocks both experimentally and numerically. The authors of these studies found that the amplitude of shock motion decreased with increasing frequency (see Fig.…”
Section: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum shock speed observed in experiments was 9 ms 1 , which implies that the shock could potentially move a streamwise distance of up to 1.1 mm during an exposure. Hence, it is estimated that shock position in a [7], b) Ott et al [2], and c) Edwards and Squire [6].…”
Section: A Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, comprehensive study on the advances of SBLI with emphasis on ow unsteadiness, heat transfer prediction, multi-shock boundary-layer interaction, and ow control techniques has been performed [25]. Other recent studies have been carried out on unsteadiness of SBLI [26,27] and control methods such as bleed, vortex generator, and micro actuators [28][29][30]. Also, some recent experiments and theoretical e orts have been made to investigate the e ect of ow control methods such as bleed on SBLI for supersonic and hypersonic inlets [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%