2004
DOI: 10.1177/107424840400900201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Heart Rate Versus Rhythm in Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Study

Abstract: Maintenance of sinus rhythm is superior to ventricular rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation with respect to effects on exercise capacity, quality of life, morbidity, and possibly mortality. Sinus rhythm could be restored in most patients, and amiodarone was superior to placebo in the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] All 12 randomized controlled trials were published in English. Four trials were unblinded, 2 trials were singleblinded, and 6 trials were double-blinded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] All 12 randomized controlled trials were published in English. Four trials were unblinded, 2 trials were singleblinded, and 6 trials were double-blinded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small, underpowered randomised trial of rheumatic AF, using amiodarone as a rhythm control strategy, maintained sinus rhythm in 69% of patients at 1 year. (30) The poor long-term tolerability of amiodarone, and the inability to use class I antiarrhythmic drugs (like flecainide) in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction, often preclude the use of these drugs to maintain sinus rhythm.…”
Section: Rate Versus Rhythm Control In Rheumatic Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the maintenance of sinus rhythm is important patients receiving tissue valve replacement, or balloon intervention, because they are likely to discontinue anticoagulant therapy. If AF persists, electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion are effective in restoring sinus rhythm, and the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs may be effective in preventing www.intechopen.com Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation − With Special Reference to Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Rheumatic Heart Disease 123 AF 80 . However, once AF has developed in patients with RVHD, these drugs may not be effective in restoring sinus rhythm because of the pathological changes that develop in the atrium and predispose to AF.…”
Section: Rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease and Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%