1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19980328)67:13<2213::aid-app12>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of molecular weight distribution in propylene polymerization with Ziegler-Natta/metallocene catalyst mixtures

Abstract: Propylene polymerization was investigated with a sequential addition of Ziegler-Natta and metallocene catalysts. From the fact that the molecular weights of polypropylene (PP) produced with Ziegler-Natta and with metallocene catalysts differ, it was possible to control the molecular weight distribution (MWD) of PP with a sequential addition of methylaluminoxane and rac-ethylenebis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride followed by triethylaluminum and magnesium dichloride-supported titanium tetrachloride catalyst. The o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) The third method utilizes the variation of operation conditions, such as temperature, comonomer concentration, and hydrogen pressure (non-steady-state polymerization), in a single reactor during polymerization. [4] This process is effective for laboratory-scale reactors, but is unlikely to be applied to the production of commodity polyolefins. (iv) Finally, the fourth method consists of combining two or more types of catalysts to produce polymers with different and controlled MW and MWD in a single reactor.…”
Section: Introduction and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) The third method utilizes the variation of operation conditions, such as temperature, comonomer concentration, and hydrogen pressure (non-steady-state polymerization), in a single reactor during polymerization. [4] This process is effective for laboratory-scale reactors, but is unlikely to be applied to the production of commodity polyolefins. (iv) Finally, the fourth method consists of combining two or more types of catalysts to produce polymers with different and controlled MW and MWD in a single reactor.…”
Section: Introduction and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since each of the catalysts within the binary catalyst systems is able to produce a unique polymer, it would be possible to achieve PPs with bimodal or broad MWDs if the catalyst system is properly designed. Therefore, some of the researchers used both homogeneous and heterogeneous binary metallocene silica-supported catalysts with different stereo-specificities to synthesize PPs with broad and bimodal MWD as well as stereoblock structures with different melting points [ 16 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Numerous studies have been conducted on the microstructural characterization of PPs synthesized by binary or hybrid catalyst systems as well as the effects of type and composition of catalysts on their microstructures through different characterization techniques [ 15 , 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method involves additional processes and increases costs considerably [9], and 3) Combination of a binary or multicomponent catalytic system in a single reactor with the subsequent cost saving. This last method can comprise a combination of a heterogeneous Ziegler-Natta catalyst and a homogeneous metallocene catalyst providing a means to control the MWD and polydispersity of the polyolefin [10] but a disadvantage of this particular binary system comes from triethyl-aluminium (TEA) used to activate Ziegler-Natta since it has a serious detrimental effect on metallocene active sites [11] Therefore, an economical and attractive route is to use two or more metallocenes simultaneously yielding a polypropylene mixture consisting on the polymer fractions produced by each metallocene [12][13][14][15][16]. In this sense, it is important to decide which metalocenes will be present in the catalytic system, since they should have different kinetic responses, such as different propagation and termination rate constants, in order to produce a blend of polymeric chains with different predominant molecular weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%