2002
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Neural Information Transmission by Synaptic Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. It has similarities to a number of previous models that have been advanced to describe synaptic properties (Kusano and Landau 1975; Abbott et al 1997; Tsodyks and Markram 1997; Dittman et al 2000; Cartling 2002; Yang and Xu-Friedman 2008; Ruiz et al 2011; Hennig 2013). We call this model the NpRf model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…3. It has similarities to a number of previous models that have been advanced to describe synaptic properties (Kusano and Landau 1975; Abbott et al 1997; Tsodyks and Markram 1997; Dittman et al 2000; Cartling 2002; Yang and Xu-Friedman 2008; Ruiz et al 2011; Hennig 2013). We call this model the NpRf model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In an animal study, Adkins et al (2006) observed that motor training led to synaptogenesis synaptic potentiation, and reorganization of movement representations within the motor cortex. This is relevant as synapses affect the transmission efficiency of information ( Cartling, 2002 ) and are related with cognitive development ( Choi et al, 2018 ). Evidence shows that GMS shares common underlying processes with IC observed in sorting, monitoring, and planning tasks ( Boxtel et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of various kinds of measures of information transfer at the synapse level has been explored in many papers. For instance, in [ 8 ] information transmission is studied through a master equation based stochastic model of presynaptic release of vesicles (which depends on intracellular calcium concentration), combined with a low dimensional model of membrane charging at the postsynaptic side. The model itself has an advantage over models of average quantities, in that it captures fluctuations of the dynamic variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%