2003
DOI: 10.1086/502211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Where Shall We Send Our Hospital Director Next Time?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In the UK, the proportion of blood isolates of S. aureus that are resistant to methicillin has risen from just a few percent in the late 1980s to over 30%, with rates of over 40% seen in tertiary referral hospitals. 2 -4 Similar prevalence rates are reported from other European countries 4 and the US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In the UK, the proportion of blood isolates of S. aureus that are resistant to methicillin has risen from just a few percent in the late 1980s to over 30%, with rates of over 40% seen in tertiary referral hospitals. 2 -4 Similar prevalence rates are reported from other European countries 4 and the US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that the evolution of conflict between the infection control services and health care personnel could become unhelpful in managing an outbreak [113]; a perception can arise whereby the control 'cure' is worse than the (MRSA) infection [153]. The lack of absolutely definitive evidence from clinical randomized trials may be argued by others as a negative in applying such tools as staff screening [219]. There are many, however, who favour a 'culture' of altruism and of maintaining the integrity of infection control practice to be near sacred.…”
Section: Dialogue Disagreement and Discordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many, however, who favour a 'culture' of altruism and of maintaining the integrity of infection control practice to be near sacred. Perhaps MRSA containment may be treated as a key quality indicator, and one might also propose that there is no level for which MRSA control interventions are not warranted [219]. Perhaps the problems with implementing staff screening techniques, even when epidemiologically warranted, are administrative in nature and require but ''teeth and money'' [219].…”
Section: Dialogue Disagreement and Discordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When it has been implemented in all French hospitals, nosocomial acquisition rates of MRSA will become a key indicator of quality for hospital benchmarking. 5 …”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%