2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.184414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at the Fe/MgO interface by phthalocyanine insertion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(b) shows the XAS spectra with the background subtracted. The XAS spectrum of the LiF-free Fe/MgO multilayer looks identical to those reported in previous studies [40][41][42][43]; the XAS spectrum has a broad single peak for each of the Fe L 2,3 edges and does not exhibit multiplet features. This is also the case for the spectra with LiF insertion, except that there is a slight variation in XAS spectral line shape because of the spectral overlap between F K and Fe L 2,3 edges.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Figure 2(b) shows the XAS spectra with the background subtracted. The XAS spectrum of the LiF-free Fe/MgO multilayer looks identical to those reported in previous studies [40][41][42][43]; the XAS spectrum has a broad single peak for each of the Fe L 2,3 edges and does not exhibit multiplet features. This is also the case for the spectra with LiF insertion, except that there is a slight variation in XAS spectral line shape because of the spectral overlap between F K and Fe L 2,3 edges.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[ 44 , 45 ] Bruno's tight‐binding model, which has been validated by experiments for a magnetic interface with the SOC strength ( ζ SO ) << the bandwidth of the FM, [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] predicts K s ∝ ζ SO ∆ m orb , where ∆ m orb is the orbital moment anisotropy of the interface. Given that ∆ m orb of the GaAs/CoFe interface (∆ m orb ≈ 0.085 µ B ) is only slightly greater than that of MgO/CoFe interface (∆ m orb ≈ 0.056 µ B , see Section S2 in the Supporting Information) as suggested by X‐ray magnetic circular dichroism experiments, [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] the 20 times greater K s of the GaAs/CoFe interface than the MgO/CoFe interface reveals considerably stronger interfacial SOC than the MgO/CoFe interface. Therefore, the observation that the sin2 φ signal is much stronger for the MgO/CoFe than for the GaAs/CoFe strongly disagrees with the previous speculation that the sin2 φ second HHV signal arose from an interfacial SOC effect.…”
Section: Sample Details and Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with large tunneling magnetoresistance ratio, high thermal stability, and relatively low switching current density for applications of high-density MRAM [1]. Therefore, the origin of the PMA in the nonmagnetic/CoFeB/MgO systems has been extensively studied in the last decade and is still under debate so far [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Theoretical calculations suggest that the hybridization between the 3d orbitals of Fe/Co and 2p orbitals of O and the oxidation condition at the CoFeB/MgO interface plays a critical role in PMA of ultrathin nonmagnetic/CoFe-B/MgO junctions [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%