2002
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0675:corslb>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of regional sea level by surface uplift and subsidence caused by magmatic underplating of Earth's crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relief between the inner and intermediateouter zones has to be of the same order of thickness in order for the inner zone to be in a state of erosion while the eroded materials accumulated in the intermediate-outer zones. In this sense, the magnitude of uplift due to underplating is about 2000 m. McKenzie (1984) and MacLennan and Lovell (2002) argued that surface uplift is one-tenth of the thickness of magmatic underplating layer. Crustal elevation of 2000 m therefore implies an underplating layer 20 km in depth.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sedimentation Before and After Emeishan Volcanmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relief between the inner and intermediateouter zones has to be of the same order of thickness in order for the inner zone to be in a state of erosion while the eroded materials accumulated in the intermediate-outer zones. In this sense, the magnitude of uplift due to underplating is about 2000 m. McKenzie (1984) and MacLennan and Lovell (2002) argued that surface uplift is one-tenth of the thickness of magmatic underplating layer. Crustal elevation of 2000 m therefore implies an underplating layer 20 km in depth.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sedimentation Before and After Emeishan Volcanmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Solidification of the magma subsequent to emplacement is thought to cause contraction of the underplated material. Maclennan and Lovell (2002) have calculated that surface subsidence associated with this contraction is equal to approximately half the original uplift and takes places within about 0.1 Ma of injection of the magma. We propose that volcanic activity of the Eifel field post 0.7 Ma was caused by magmatic underplating around 0.7 Ma and that rapid and distributed incision of all major streams in the region was driven by dome-shaped uplift as- rate p [d O Ϫ 0.9] been arbitrarily chosen for oxygen data to translate into hypothetical model erosion rates that fit the measured data.…”
Section: Paleoerosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong evidences of underplating occurring during the rifting comes from petrological indications of both fractionation at lower crustal pressures, temperatures, and crustal contamination occurring during the melt migration into shallow or deep magma chambers (Cox, 1993). Dynamic evidences of underplating are often proposed to explain surface uplift, massive sand influx and sea level variations and the low subsidence rate that occurs during and after the breakup along the volcanic margins and their adjacent areas (Maclennan and Lovell, 2002).…”
Section: Monday 04 July 2005 Version Finalementioning
confidence: 99%