1995
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.59.4.623-645.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
162
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 280 publications
(432 reference statements)
1
162
1
Order By: Relevance
“…B. subtilis has 10 rrn operons, but only two types [15]. E. coli has seven rrn operons, but only two types [16]. The variation was comparable to that of V. cholerae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…B. subtilis has 10 rrn operons, but only two types [15]. E. coli has seven rrn operons, but only two types [16]. The variation was comparable to that of V. cholerae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…An intergenic spacer without a tRNA gene has been reported from Bacillus subtilis [15]. E. coli has two di¡erent types of spacer : one contains the tRNA Glu gene, while the other contains the tRNA Ile and tRNA Ala genes [16]. A spacer encoding tRNA Glu , tRNA Lys and tRNA Val has previously only been found in V. cholerae and V. mimicus [10,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2) possesses the conserved domains D1, D1′, D2, D3 and D4, that are required for correct folding of the rRNA transcript. The antiterminator box A, a motif of 12 nucleotides, that is essential for maintaining transcription of the rRNA genes in the correct stoichiometry (Berg et al, 1989;Condon et al, 1995), is immediately adjacent to domain D4 at the base of the 23S rRNA processing stem (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Internal Transcribed Spacer Its-l and Its-s: Comparison Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an association raises a question as to what regulates Rho outside ORFs (notably during transcription of long leader regions) when there is no ribosome trailing behind RNAP to increase its processivity (Proshkin et al, 2010) nor to prevent the mRNA from associating with Rho (Roberts et al, 2008;Rabhi et al, 2010). One possibility is that, as observed during transcription of ribosomal rrn operons or bacteriophage l chromosome (reviewed in Condon et al, 1995;Roberts et al, 2008;Sen et al, 2008), accessory factors bind, in a conditional manner, to RNA and/or to the transcription machinery to form an antitermination complex resistant to Rho. Antitermination complexes that resist to Rho-dependent termination signals within rrn and l operons contain the NusA, NusB, NusE (ribosomal protein S10), and NusG factors as well as specific factors such as bacteriophage N protein for lN antitermination or ribosomal proteins (S2, S4, L1, L3, L4, and L13) and other unidentified cellular factor(s) for rrn antitermination (Condon et al, 1995;Torres et al, 2001;Roberts et al, 2008;Sen et al, 2008). Both rrn and lN antitermination complexes are stabilized by elaborate networks of interactions among their many components that include binding of a NusB-NusE heterodimer to a boxA RNA sequence found in the rrn and l transcripts (Roberts et al, 2008;Sen et al, 2008) and binding of NusG to RNAP through its N-terminal domain (NusG-NTD) and to NusE through its C-terminal domain (NusG-CTD; Mooney et al, 2009b;Burmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%